Board index » delphi » Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
![]() Delphi Developer |
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
![]() Delphi Developer |
Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!2005-01-24 01:53:41 AM delphi137 Will DeWitt Jr. writes: QuoteNow, while ULONG_PTR (and hence, DWORD_PTR) are dependent on whether is 32 bit (DWORD), etc. <g> -- Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] rvelthuis.bei.t-online.de "A hen is only an egg’s way of making another egg." -- Samuel Butler |
Jim Cooper
![]() Delphi Developer |
2005-01-24 01:58:15 AM
Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!QuoteI may happen so what? for a while yet, as you correctly (IMO) point out. QuoteAs far as I remember Borland did not release Cheers, Jim Cooper _______________________________________________ Jim Cooper XXXX@XXXXX.COM Falafel Software www.falafelsoft.com _______________________________________________ |
Kostya
![]() Delphi Developer |
2005-01-24 02:03:00 AM
Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!QuoteI would agree with this sentiment. However, some people here have taken Some are programmers that want to learn something new or make their resume better. Many others I think act like a lemmings following the flute whistles. Kostya |
Jim Cooper
![]() Delphi Developer |
2005-01-24 02:13:17 AM
Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!QuoteSome of them are early adopters QuoteMany others I think act like a Possibly the lemmings don't know these things either though. If you are referring to the Pied Piper story, that was rats (and then children) ;-) Cheers, Jim Cooper _______________________________________________ Jim Cooper XXXX@XXXXX.COM Falafel Software www.falafelsoft.com _______________________________________________ |
Johnnie Norsworthy
![]() Delphi Developer |
2005-01-24 02:23:04 AM
Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!
"Jim Cooper" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
Quote
|
Abdullah Kauchali
![]() Delphi Developer |
2005-01-24 02:23:39 AM
Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] writes:
QuoteNow identify al the code in the VCL which assumes the size of a pointer that shows where the VCL will break because of DWORD now catering for int64? |
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
![]() Delphi Developer |
2005-01-24 02:37:42 AM
Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!
Abdullah Kauchali writes:
QuoteRudy Velthuis [TeamB] writes: LongWord. I have no idea if they could be a problem. I can als imagine that code passing PChars in a DWORD parameter could be problematic. I guess one would have to have Win64 installed, and do a lot of tests to see if there are any problems. I don't have a 64 bit processor here. -- Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] rvelthuis.bei.t-online.de "Humor is also a way of saying something serious." -- T. S. Eliot (1888 - 1965) |
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
![]() Delphi Developer |
2005-01-24 02:49:16 AM
Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!
Will DeWitt Jr. writes:
QuoteNick Hodges [TeamB] writes: -- Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] rvelthuis.bei.t-online.de "M{*word*203}indignation is jealousy with a halo." -- H. G. Wells (1866-1946) |
Ingvar Nilsen
![]() Delphi Developer |
2005-01-24 02:52:35 AM
Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!
Johnnie Norsworthy writes:
Quote>Why not use Delphi to write the web services? -- Ingvar Nilsen |
Ingvar Nilsen
![]() Delphi Developer |
2005-01-24 03:02:42 AM
Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] writes:
QuoteWill DeWitt Jr. writes: Ingvar Nilsen |
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
![]() Delphi Developer |
2005-01-24 03:16:35 AM
Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!
Kostya writes:
QuoteMany others I think act like a -- Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] rvelthuis.bei.t-online.de "What I am against is quotas. I am against hard quotas, quotas they basically delineate based upon whatever. However they delineate, quotas, I think, vulcanize society. So I don't know how that fits into what everybody else is saying, their relative positions, but that's my position." -- George W. Bush |
Captain Jake
![]() Delphi Developer |
2005-01-24 03:58:24 AM
Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!
"Nick Hodges [TeamB]" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
<41f3c2e7$XXXX@XXXXX.COM> QuoteAnd they did the same with support for .Net. ***Free Your Mind*** Posted with JSNewsreader-BETA 0.9.4.370 |
Captain Jake
![]() Delphi Developer |
2005-01-24 04:15:19 AM
Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!
"Will DeWitt Jr." <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
<41f3ac33$XXXX@XXXXX.COM> QuoteNeat, I take it the argument is won then. Thanks for playing guys. ***Free Your Mind*** Posted with JSNewsreader-BETA 0.9.4.370 |
Kostya
![]() Delphi Developer |
2005-01-24 04:32:06 AM
Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!QuotePossibly the lemmings don't know these things either though. If you are Kostya |
Kostya
![]() Delphi Developer |
2005-01-24 04:33:58 AM
Re: Why 64bit Delphi compiler from Borland may be meaningless!QuoteHmmm... looks like you are confusing two stories. Rats followed the Kostya |