Board index » delphi » C#, but relevant.....

C#, but relevant.....


2006-06-09 03:25:23 PM
delphi143
Remember how we always used to hear "Why are Delphi binaries so big compared
to VB?"
I just saw a posting in a C# newsgroup that amused me:
"People, why are C# generated binaries so much bigger than Java ones?"
It would seem that you just can not please everyone :-)
--
Pete
====
Audio compression components, DIB graphics controls, ECO extensions,
FastStrings
www.droopyeyes.com
My blog
blogs.slcdug.org/petermorris/
 
 

Re:C#, but relevant.....

Peter Morris [Droopy eyes software] writes:
Quote
"People, why are C# generated binaries so much bigger than Java ones?"
They are?
LP,
Dejan
 

Re:C#, but relevant.....

Dejan Stanič writes:
Quote
They are?
That person has obviously no idea about how Java works. There is
bytecode, but no binary. One could say the same goes for .NET in a way,
but I consider it very much different.
--
Holger
Blog: www.flickdotnet.de
 

Re:C#, but relevant.....

Quote
There is bytecode, but no binary.
For better or for worse, since the .class file is a binary format* (that
contains the bytecode) some Java people just then refer to a .class file
in "Java jargon" as "a binary".
When someone talks to me about Java binaries, I take it simply as the
plural of binary, which means nothing more than 2 or more .class or .jar
(binary formated) files. Not "binaries" such as a compilied program (such
as the "java binaries"). Same word, but different context (jargon versus
technical) and meaning. Jargon is cultural, no use in correcting people..
*java.sun.com/docs/books/vmspec/2nd-edition/html/Overview.doc.html
Kevin