Board index » delphi » Re: Borland helps Open Source comunity

Re: Borland helps Open Source comunity


2005-05-19 11:35:40 PM
delphi28
Wayne Niddery [TeamB] writes:
Quote
The truth is that "exhorbitant" is a very loaded word. To many people in the
open source community, anything more than $0 is exhorbitant, and for most of
them anything more than very cheap is. However, for Borland, who *must* make
a profit to survive and cannot do so by giving away it is intellectual
property freely or cheaply, the price was probably not exhorbitant at all
but rather very reasonable.

The open source community is not "owed" any special consideration with
regard to patents or price. There "need" is not an obligation on Borland or
any other commercial enterprise.
Fair enough.
However, we've also established that Kylix uses Winelib. Now, in all
likelihood, if I owned certain patents, I'd enforce them quite
literally. However, *this* particular case requires a measure of
goodwill - an act that symbolises gratitude *both* ways - because
Borland seems to be "profiting" from Winelib. Is there no room for
sensible acknowledgement?
(Remember Wayne, your points are diametrically opposite to Danny
Thorpe's - who reiterates his and Borland's commitment to Open Source
software. In other words, you are disagreeing with him.)
 
 

Re: Borland helps Open Source comunity

Abdullah Kauchali writes:
Quote
It's a pity that the matter seems to
have become a public debate, and that official stand-points are based
on such unprofessional journalism.
Well, I know that this isn't what you meant, but I think that
unprofessional journalism *should* be debated. Or at least discussed.
Quote
I personally think Borland should
attempt to contact the Winelib team again for renewed negotiations.

It's in both parties' interest, wouldn't you agree?
AFAICS, the only benefit to Borland is PR and warm fuzzies, but yes,
that has some worth. The benefit to Wine is more substantive.
Quote
>Presumably under the terms of Winelib's license, as I am not aware
>of any special exception for Kylix.

Well, then it should be a simple quid-pro-quo equation, shouldn't it?
No. AFAIK, the Wine license (as with most F/OS software) allows anyone
to use Wine and Winelib for nearly any purpose with no expectaion of
compensation. Donations are always nice, but not required in any way.
For example, I donated money to Colin Wilson for making such a nice
newsreader available, but it wouldn't be illegal for me to use XanaNews
without doing so.
--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] ?Vertex Systems Corp. ?Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
Everything You Need to Know About InterBase Character Sets:
blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/articles/403.aspx
 

Re: Borland helps Open Source comunity

Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] writes:
Quote
Who says it is a protocol?
Channel? Approach? Method? Procedure?
 

Re: Borland helps Open Source comunity

At 17:36:26, 19.05.2005, Abdullah Kauchali writes:
Quote
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] writes:
>Who says it is a protocol?

Channel? Approach? Method? Procedure?
Approach sounds OK.
How should Borland know who will try to contact them?
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] velthuis.homepage.t-online.de
"I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I
did not have C++ in mind." -- Alan Kay
 

Re: Borland helps Open Source comunity

Abdullah Kauchali writes:
Quote
Ok, I understand. So, what is the fuss all about? Why do they need
to talk to Borland about this if the Winelib team can simply implement
SEH with their own implementation? After all, the copyright should
be sufficient protection for Borland, right?
No. Copyrights protect expressions of ideas, whereas patents protect
the idea itself. If I were to copyright my implementation of a bubble
sort (which I can do in most countries simply by writing it), then it's
against the law for you to cut and paste (or otherwise transcribe) my
code, but you can still write your own implementation of the bubble
sort. If I patent a bubble sort (hmmm... I wonder if someone has done
this already...) then you can not write your own bubble sort, but you can
write a different kind of sort implementation.
...and probably should! :)
-Craig
--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] ?Vertex Systems Corp. ?Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
Want to help make Delphi and InterBase better? Use QC!
qc.borland.com -- Vote for important issues
 

Re: Borland helps Open Source comunity

At 17:29:12, 19.05.2005, Abdullah Kauchali writes:
Quote
Wayne Niddery [TeamB] writes:
>They invented a particularly good implementation of it, they did not
>invent the basic idea of exception handling (which is the proper
>basis of a patent - an implementation, not the idea being
>implemented).

Ok, I understand. So, what is the fuss all about? Why do they need to
talk to Borland about this if the Winelib team can simply implement
SEH with their own implementation?
Borland's implementation is so obvious, that it is quite a little harder
to do it differently. That is what the fuss is all about.
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] velthuis.homepage.t-online.de
"We should leave our minds open, but not so open that our brains fall
out." -- Alan Ross Anderson
 

Re: Borland helps Open Source comunity

Craig Stuntz [TeamB] writes:
Quote
Well, I know that this isn't what you meant, but I think that
unprofessional journalism *should* be debated. Or at least discussed.
I agree. The matter should also be dealt with these people, of course.
But, IMVHO, Borland can shut these irresponsible people *once* and
*for all* by negotiating a lasting agreement with the Winelib folks.
That will be a kick in the balls to the sensationalist journalists,
and they will feel it.
Quote
AFAICS, the only benefit to Borland is PR and warm fuzzies, but yes,
that has some worth. The benefit to Wine is more substantive.
Hmm, but what of Borland's commitment to open source software? Does
*this* case not throw a dark shadow ito Borland's official policy
towards open source software? Are you not trivialising the matter a tad
bit here?
Quote
No. AFAIK, the Wine license (as with most F/OS software) allows anyone
to use Wine and Winelib for nearly any purpose with no expectaion of
compensation. Donations are always nice, but not required in any way.
For example, I donated money to Colin Wilson for making such a nice
newsreader available, but it wouldn't be illegal for me to use XanaNews
without doing so.
I'm aware of that. But my previous point refers here too.
 

Re: Borland helps Open Source comunity

Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] writes:
Quote
How should Borland know who will try to contact them?
Is that it????
Ok, wait a moment. I will get the official fellow from the Winelib
team to contact you. Is that alright?
 

Re: Borland helps Open Source comunity

Craig Stuntz [TeamB] writes:
Quote
No. Copyrights protect expressions of ideas, whereas patents protect
the idea itself. If I were to copyright my implementation of a bubble
sort (which I can do in most countries simply by writing it), then it's
against the law for you to cut and paste (or otherwise transcribe) my
code, but you can still write your own implementation of the bubble
sort. If I patent a bubble sort (hmmm... I wonder if someone has done
this already...) then you can not write your own bubble sort, but you can
write a different kind of sort implementation.
I understand that much, Craig. That copyrights protect your from
"cut-&-paste" - not the concept.
But if you guys are equating the currect Winelib issue to this, then
how does the patenting issue feature?
I am really stupid, please help me understand.
 

Re: Borland helps Open Source comunity

At 17:45:17, 19.05.2005, Abdullah Kauchali writes:
Quote
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] writes:
>How should Borland know who will try to contact them?

Is that it????

Ok, wait a moment. I will get the official fellow from the Winelib
team to contact you. Is that alright?
Why me? I am not Borland.
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] velthuis.homepage.t-online.de
"Give me chastity and continence, but not yet."
-- Saint Augustine (354-430)
 

Re: Borland helps Open Source comunity

Abdullah Kauchali writes:
Quote
(Remember Wayne, your points are diametrically opposite to Danny
Thorpe's - who reiterates his and Borland's commitment to Open Source
software. In other words, you are disagreeing with him.)
He does?
I mean, I don't know that he or Borland *isn't* committed to OS, but I
don't see it in the blog entry we're discussing.
This isn't totally relevant to the discussion, as what someone
*doesn't* say usually can not be presumed to imply what they *do*
believe, but I want to make sure words aren't being put in Danny's
mouth.
--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] ?Vertex Systems Corp. ?Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
Want to help make Delphi and InterBase better? Use QC!
qc.borland.com -- Vote for important issues
 

Re: Borland helps Open Source comunity

Abdullah Kauchali writes:
Quote
>AFAICS, the only benefit to Borland is PR and warm fuzzies, but
>yes, that has some worth. The benefit to Wine is more substantive.

Hmm, but what of Borland's commitment to open source software? Does
*this* case not throw a dark shadow ito Borland's official policy
towards open source software? Are you not trivialising the matter a
tad bit here?
I'm not aware of a Borland "official policy" on open source. I have seen
statements from execs from time to time on the subject, but never
anything quite as coherent as a policy.
Nor do I believe that saying that Borland could benefit from PR is
trivializing it. PR is often very valuable. I am mostly saying that the
benefit to Wine is probably higher than to Borland.
--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] ?Vertex Systems Corp. ?Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
Useful articles about InterBase development:
blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/category/21.aspx
 

Re: Borland helps Open Source comunity

Abdullah Kauchali writes:
Quote
But if you guys are equating the currect Winelib issue to this, then
how does the patenting issue feature?

I am really stupid, please help me understand.
I may be stupider, because I don't understand your question. Can you
rephrase?
Borland patented a technique for SEH, not SEH itself. This is, to me,
like patenting a technique for sorting, but not sorts in general. And
it's certainly different from copyright.
--
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] ?Vertex Systems Corp. ?Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
IB 6 versions prior to 6.0.1.6 are pre-release and may corrupt
your DBs! Open Edition users, get 6.0.1.6 from mers.com
 

Re: Borland helps Open Source comunity

Craig Stuntz [TeamB] writes:
Quote
He does?

I mean, I don't know that he or Borland *isn't* committed to OS, but I
don't see it in the blog entry we're discussing.

This isn't totally relevant to the discussion, as what someone
*doesn't* say usually can not be presumed to imply what they *do*
believe, but I want to make sure words aren't being put in Danny's
mouth.
Ok, guilty as charged.
Next question: What is Borland's official policy vis-a-vis OSS?
 

Re: Borland helps Open Source comunity

Abdullah Kauchali writes:
Quote
The folks whose comments Borland ought to
respond to are the Winelib project members'. And I am pretty sure
they have not closed the doors for negotiation - after all it is in
their interest.
Right -- but the publicity problem isn't with these folks, is it. ;-)
--
Nick Hodges -- TeamB
Lemanix Corporation -- www.lemanix.com
Read my Blog -- www.lemanix.com/nick