Board index » delphi » Re: OWL -- Was Borland involved in the selection of the name ?

2003-08-07 09:30:48 AM
delphi194
"Rosimildo da Silva" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
sm
 

In article <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>, "John Herbster \(TeamB
\)" <herb-sci1_at_sbcglobal.net>says...
years. It has specific impact in areas like the semantic web. In a
sense, standards like ebXML are ontologies in their own right.
From www.w3.org/TR/2002/WD-owl-features-20020729/
<quote>
The OWL Web Ontology Language is being designed by the W3C Web
Ontology Working Group in order to provide a language that can be used
for applications that need to understand the content of information
instead of just understanding the human-readable presentation of
content. OWL facilitates greater machine readability of web content
than XML, RDF, and RDF-S support by providing a additional vocabulary
for term descriptions. This document provides an introduction to the
OWL language. It first describes a simpler version of the full OWL
language which is referred to as OWL Lite and then describes OWL by
addition to OWL Lite.
</quote>
OWL marked up pages make it easier for indexers, categorizers and
information miners to get the right information out, rather than having
to guess at what the web-colouring-in-monkey intended.
I also refer you to
www.cyc.com/
and
www.opencyc.org/
to see some applications of other ontologies.
--
John
Life is complex. It has real and imaginary components.
 

John Wester [Group W] writes:
basically *stopped* advances on the web. Until MS decides to include
things on IE, it has a huge chance of die in between.
Rosimildo.
 

Rosimildo da Silva writes:
Windows OS.
Could that mean that the OS has a huge chance to die in between as well <g>
 

SiegfriedN writes:
1998. It is getting boring. These kinds of "plugins" or the like, until
integrated on IE, it does not anywhere.
If Mozilla would pass 1.5% of market share, it would help a bit.
Rosimildo.
 

Please take this to off-topic. It has nothing to do with Delphi.
Thank you,
-Craig