Board index » delphi » Re: A Turbo Delphi question ...

2006-08-11 04:56:00 AM
delphi64
For the IDE, yes. For your Win32 VCL (Turbo Delphi and Turbo C++)
applications, no.
--
Allen Bauer
DevCo Chief Scientist
Borland^H^H^H^H^H^H^HDevCo Software Corporation.
blogs.borland.com/abauer
"Ted" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes

As i understood, there will be a win32 version alone, without the need of
.Net Framework.
"Ted" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>escribi?en el mensaje

As Allen said:
"For the IDE, yes. For your Win32 VCL (Turbo Delphi and Turbo C++)
applications, no."
Zoboo writes:
Anders Ohlsson - blogs.borland.com/ao/
Borland Developer Tools Group ("DevCo")
"Golf is a terrible game. I am glad I don't have
to play again until tomorrow." - Anonymous
 

In article <44db9d81$XXXX@XXXXX.COM>, "Zoboo" <shereshevsky at
hotmail dot com>says...
--
Jolyon Smith
 

"Allen Bauer" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
 

Chris Burrows writes:
--
Nick Hodges
Delphi/C# Product Manager - DevCo
blogs.borland.com/nickhodges
 

The Win32 version doesn't require .NET at all in your applications - in fact
it doesn't support .NET development.... however the BDS/Delphi IDE on which
the Turbo's are based has a few features that are coded in C#, and thus even
though your app doesn't need it, those features do...
FYI, the IDE is a Win32 app, that has a few .NET built features. So it is a
Hybrid, so to speak. The .NET runtime is about 23mb - so it add's about 23mb
(or 5 average itunes or mp3 songs worth) to your development footprint. It
adds 0mb (or no itunes or mp3 songs worth) to your deployed app footprint...
still good ole standalone exe's
-m
"Zoboo" <shereshevsky at hotmail dot com>writes

Michael sayz:
Refractoring and Together. Is there anything else?
 

Hello Allen,
Why you havn't '(Borland)' or '(Borland/DevCo)' sign on your post just like other Borland staff?
Maybe this hints YOUR ROADMAP? :)
Best Regards
Turbo Man
 

Michael Swindell (Borland) writes:
users do have broadband these days, but tens of MB is still getting
frowned upon.
Delphi's main attractiveness is that it allows you to create lean and
mean applications without any .NET dependencies. This point is
significantly harder to get across if the Delphi IDE itself contains
inefficient bloat like Together, an old version of the .NET framework
and J#.
I tell people to use Delphi to create fast and small apps and the first
thing they see is Delphi wanting to install J#? J what?
You are basicly saying: Yeah sure Delphi is bloat, but it allows you
create applications without bloat. Confusing.
Jan Derk
 

"Jan Derk" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
line, then 323 MB is probably also OK.
Regards
Uffe
 

lhaymehr writes:
applications written in Delphi, BCB or Delphi.Net. There is also an
option to list all managed assemblies, not just ones written in Delphi.
Point this at the BDS directory and you can make an educated guess
about what functionality is in some of the assemblies from their names.
cc.borland.com/Item.aspx
There are other ways to recognize Delphi applications here:
delphi.wikia.com/wiki/Determine_Delphi_Application
--
Regards,
Bruce McGee
Glooscap Software
 

Jan Derk writes:
no matter what. If they're that concerned about the extra 75 minutes
for the .NET, they could go somewhere with broadband and a burner, and
save themselves all kinds of time.
come in large packages. that is widely accepted and understood. And
while some folks insist in clinging to the "I hate .NET" mindset, most
reasonable computer enthusiasts have long since figured out that it is a
one-shot install, and not a big deal.
 

Why you havn't '(Borland)' or '(Borland/DevCo)' sign on your post just
like other Borland staff?
Maybe this hints YOUR ROADMAP? :)
I do. See below ;-)
--
Allen Bauer
DevCo Chief Scientist
Borland^H^H^H^H^H^H^HDevCo Software Corporation.
blogs.borland.com/abauer
 

he is talking about "Allen Bauer (Borland/DevCo)" ;o)