Board index » delphi » Separate releases: Delphi 10 Win32 / Delphi 10 .Net

2005-01-08 01:48:04 AM
delphi117
I would prefer that. Especially a Win32 IDE without .Net dependencies.
 

Put in QC, vote for it
--
Best regards, Serge Dosyukov
Dragon Soft
-------------------------------------------------
Check Delphi 7 ->Delphi 2005 chart www.dragonsoftru.com
Try our DS Plug-in System, now with Delphi 2005 support
www.dragonsoftru.com
"Max" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes

Max writes:
(1) Win32 + .NET
(2) Win32 Only
(3) .NET Only
Or maybe checkboxes next to each feature:
[x] Win32
[x] .NET
And then the installer could figure out whether .NET is required or not.
Of course, you'd probably have to accept that some features of the IDE
(Together, ECO) wouldn't work then so the list would be:
[x] Win32
[ ] .NET
[/] Together
[/] ECO
(/ = disabled if .NET not selected)
Cheers,
Kevin.
 

Max writes:
 

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Kevin Berry writes:
Craig Stuntz [TeamB] ?Vertex Systems Corp. ?Columbus, OH
Delphi/InterBase Weblog : blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz
Want to help make Delphi and InterBase better? Use QC!
qc.borland.com -- Vote for important issues
 

"Kevin Berry" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
requirements (cpu/ram) and hd space needed were listed after each option
too.
 

"Max" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
platform. Do you think there will be full Win32 support in next generation
of Windows ?
Instead of it I'd vote for fixing bugs in current IDE version. I don't
see anything wrong on using .NET where it makes sense, even in case the IDE
produces Win32 application.
Petr
 

It will be Win32 support on many new version of Windows, because nobody will
buy new version of Windows from Microsoft, if existing and expensive
programs (Photoshop, 3DSMax, Maya, Dreamweaver, Video Games) are not
working. In that case Linux may made great win over Windows with some
perfect Win32 emulator.
"Petr Vones" <no@mail>writes

Serge Dosyukov (Dragon Soft) writes:
*against* feature requests they don't like.
--
Regards,
Bruce McGee
Glooscap Software
 

You can do it today
Put vote with level 1, it will lover overall value and prevent raising a
flag
Remember about 3.5 rating (or something like this) which is required for QC#
to be considered
--
Best regards, Serge Dosyukov
Dragon Soft
-------------------------------------------------
Check Delphi 7 ->Delphi 2005 chart www.dragonsoftru.com
Try our DS Plug-in System, now with Delphi 2005 support
www.dragonsoftru.com
"Bruce McGee" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes

MS already have some problems pushing consumers to new OS versions.
 

Bruce McGee writes:
I am more than happy with the current bundling of the D2005 SKUs, and
think that, compared to previous Delphi and C#Builder releases, it is
excellent value for money. I think people are under the impression that
having a Win32 only SKU would be 1/3 of the D2005 price, which I doubt
would be the case.
--
Cheers,
David Clegg
dclegg_at_ebetonline_dot_com
Vote 1 cc.borland.com/codecentral/ccweb.exe/listing :-)
Now supports Google Groups searching with Dyna-extend(tm) technology!
QualityCentral. The best way to bug Borland about bugs.
qc.borland.com
"I hope I didn't brain my damage." - Homer Simpson
 

"David Clegg" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
Delphi more stable. D2005 is huge and, not surprisingly, is full of bugs,
for it is much more difficult to debug and stuff.
I personally thought I'd enjoy playing with D2005, but at the end of the
day, I still haven't made the move. This is the first time I don't upgrade
my projects to the next Win32 version of Delphi after having purchased it.
For me, it just tells me that there is something really wrong with Borland's
business strategy. I started having that feeling with D8, it then got
confirmed with CBX and now D2005. Not good, not good... :(
Alan.
 

"Gray" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>wrote
Win16/32 brought GUI and multitasking. Those are visible improvements over
DOS. 2000 and XP brought reliability, although not all consumers cared as
much, so as a result there are still people running 98. What's .Net going to
bring? Slower and more bloated applications? Which consumer in their right
mind would go for that? I know lots of people who bought brand new graphics
cards just to play doom3 or hl2. that is the killer application paradigm. I
cannot, for the life of me, think of one scenario where a desktop
application written on top of .Net does things for the consumer that a
W32/64 application cannot do better.
 

"David Clegg" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>wrote
fixing bugs and adding features for the platform that I actually use.