Board index » delphi » Re: Guidelines please

2005-07-27 09:11:05 AM
delphi46
Ingvar Nilsen writes:
the opportunity and responsibility to be aware of all of these things.
We review the financials regularly with every employee present. Most
companies aren't run this way, but it isn't uncommon, either:
www.inc.com/guides/hr/23178.html
-Craig
 

On 25 Jul 2005 16:02:55 -0700, "John Kaster (Borland)"
<XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes:
and no strings attached, or you pay way less, and you have to pay them
3% of the revenues.
www.unrealtechnology.com/html/licensing/terms.shtml
(Bert: notice the terms "Royalty-Bearing License" and "Royalty-Free
License")
It seems to me it would be way harder to implement this for a product
such as Delphi with sufficient success.
- Asbjørn
 

Craig Stuntz writes:
of software is only a fraction of the total costs of acquiring and using
new software. The smaller the company, the more important the initial
price tag becomes.
people and self-employed tradesmen. You notice this when talking abut
tax, expenses, efficiency, benefits and - development tools.
--
Ingvar Nilsen
www.ingvarius.com
 

David Clegg writes:
--
Ingvar Nilsen
www.ingvarius.com
 

Bert Verhees <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
<XXXX@XXXXX.COM>
gone off on a tangent based on that misunderstanding. English is my first
language. I consistently excelled in all verbal skills back when I was in
school and in standardized tests, so I am willing to entertain the theory
that I understand English better than most people (actually according to the
standardized tests, better than over 99% of the U.S. population, not to put
too fine a point on it). I read Dale's statement as meaning that even the
Architect version is a great deal when you compare it to the money that
Delphi helps you make. There was nothing in Dale's comment about basing a
business model on the revenues or profits of Delphi users, that all seemed to
come out of nowhere in the row between you and John Kaster. As for
"interfering with your business", well, not only was there nothing in Dale's
statement to suggest anything of the sort, but I can not even see how you could
get that out of anything anyone else has said here either.
I think this is an excellent opportunity for you to take the high road and
admit you erred in your interpretation of Dale's statement.
--
Everything in this post is mere opinion.
It might be very well formed opinion based
on an uncanny grasp of the facts, but it
remains opinion nevertheless.
Here's where you will find Absolute Truth:
blogs.slcdug.org/jjacobson/
Posted with JSNewsreader-BETA 0.9.4.1045
 

Bert Verhees <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
<XXXX@XXXXX.COM>
hotel you were leaving.
--
Everything in this post is mere opinion.
It might be very well formed opinion based
on an uncanny grasp of the facts, but it
remains opinion nevertheless.
Here's where you will find Absolute Truth:
blogs.slcdug.org/jjacobson/
Posted with JSNewsreader-BETA 0.9.4.1045
 

Ingvar Nilsen <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
<XXXX@XXXXX.COM>
repeats things with far more accuracy than I see most of the time in this
newsgroup. <g>
But there is a point here, namely that it takes more than just the ability to
listen to others, but also an ability to apply good logic and reasoning to
what was said.
--
Everything in this post is mere opinion.
It might be very well formed opinion based
on an uncanny grasp of the facts, but it
remains opinion nevertheless.
Here's where you will find Absolute Truth:
blogs.slcdug.org/jjacobson/
Posted with JSNewsreader-BETA 0.9.4.1045
 

John Jacobson aka Captain Jake writes:
it if you would use your much vaunted linguistic skills more
accurately. All my attempts were to explain the innocuous concept of
royalties.
--
John Kaster blogs.borland.com/johnk
Features and bugs: qc.borland.com
Get source: cc.borland.com
If it is not here, it is not happening: ec.borland.com
 

Lord Crc writes:
it. As I said in MY FIRST POST ON THE SUBJECT (not yelling at you since
you appear to understand this, but trying to emphasize the point), this
was the basis of several "what if?" discussions we've had. The
enforceability of such an arrangement is the first thing to cast doubt
on it effectiveness.
--
John Kaster blogs.borland.com/johnk
Features and bugs: qc.borland.com
Get source: cc.borland.com
If it is not here, it is not happening: ec.borland.com
 

"John Kaster (Borland)" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
<42e707e4$XXXX@XXXXX.COM>
something that occurs *between* two people. I also did not say anything about
whether you were creating or antagonizing the situation or not.
--
Everything in this post is mere opinion.
It might be very well formed opinion based
on an uncanny grasp of the facts, but it
remains opinion nevertheless.
Here's where you will find Absolute Truth:
blogs.slcdug.org/jjacobson/
Posted with JSNewsreader-BETA 0.9.4.1046
 

"John Jacobson aka Captain Jake" wrote
"My such a clever boy - and doesn't his mother dress him nicely." ;-)
 

John Jacobson aka Captain Jake writes:
the < 1 percentile), "row" is far more emotionally charged than
"disagreement."
See definition 3 at dictionary.reference.com/search
row
n.
A boisterous disturbance or quarrel; a brawl. See Synonyms at brawl.
An uproar; a great noise.
I think you can see from this definition why I take exception to your
choice of noun describing the ongoing discussion.
--
John Kaster blogs.borland.com/johnk
Features and bugs: qc.borland.com
Get source: cc.borland.com
If it is not here, it is not happening: ec.borland.com
 

Bert Verhees writes:
--
Nick Hodges -- TeamB
Lemanix Corporation -- www.lemanix.com
Read my Blog -- www.lemanix.com/nick
 

"John Kaster (Borland)" wrote
termed a "disagreement", if I start one it is called a "boisterous disturbance or
quarrel; a brawl." ;-)
Are you and Capt'n gonna start a "I'm in the < 1 percentile" club with his
talking parrot as your mascot?<r,d&h>
 

Angra Mainyu writes:
--
John Kaster blogs.borland.com/johnk
Features and bugs: qc.borland.com
Get source: cc.borland.com
If it is not here, it is not happening: ec.borland.com