Board index » delphi » CodeGear and Beta Testing
Francois Malan
![]() Delphi Developer |
Francois Malan
![]() Delphi Developer |
CodeGear and Beta Testing2006-11-20 03:10:08 PM delphi208 What will be the CodeGear strategy around beta testing? Will it still be a "closed" group or will there be more widespread public testing (or maybe limited to Delphi Developers)? Personally I'd like to see a more open strategy regarding beta testing prior to release. -- |
Francois Malan
![]() Delphi Developer |
2006-11-20 04:20:23 PM
Re:CodeGear and Beta Testing
Joanna Carter [TeamB] writes:
Quote"Francois Malan" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>a icrit even add stubs to generated exe's to limit their use. One can also require a registered version of BDS (or Turbo Pro) to be installed for IDE to work. Regardsless, I feel some for of Beta testing whereby lost of users can install different combo's of third party components and test with their own large and small projects can prove very valuable. -- |
Joanna Carter [TeamB]
![]() Delphi Developer |
2006-11-20 05:01:55 PM
Re:CodeGear and Beta Testing
"Francois Malan" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>a écrit dans le
message de news: XXXX@XXXXX.COM... | Will it still be a "closed" group or will there be more widespread | public testing (or maybe limited to Delphi Developers)? Seeing as the only Delphi Developers of BDS are, in theory, in a position to crack and supply illegal downloads of the full product, how would you envisage ensuring that only Delphi Developers were able to participate in a "Delphi Developers only" beta test ? Borland even found one "closed" beta posted on a Chinese file-sharing server !!! No matter how generous you are to your real customers, it seems there is always someone who wants to spoil the party by "biting the hand that feeds them" :-( Joanna -- Joanna Carter [TeamB] Consultant Software Engineer |
Bruce McGee
![]() Delphi Developer |
2006-11-20 06:06:19 PM
Re:CodeGear and Beta Testing
Francois Malan writes:
QuoteHow about changing the DCU format of all units that compile into an to do, I'd rather see R&D time spent on R&D rather than making a deliberately incompatible format that (hopefully) behaves identically to the one that will be shipped. QuoteRegardsless, I feel some for of Beta testing whereby lost of users can the products, tested their own projects and third party components (everyone buys with source, right?) and made useful and relevant bug reports. If it was a large number, then that could help support your point. Otherwise... -- Regards, Bruce McGee Glooscap Software |
Eivind Bakkestuen
![]() Delphi Developer |
2006-11-20 10:21:34 PM
Re:CodeGear and Beta TestingQuotePersonally I'd like to see a more open strategy regarding beta -- Eivind Bakkestuen Nexus Database Systems Pty Ltd |
Thack
![]() Delphi Developer |
2006-11-21 02:55:25 AM
Re:CodeGear and Beta TestingQuoteNo matter how generous you are to your real customers, it seems there is 1/ getting useful feedback on bugs and other issues 2/ advanced marketing of the product Isn't it equally us who are "generous" by installing and testing half-baked (by definition) code for you? Thack |
Chris Burrows
![]() Delphi Developer |
2006-11-21 07:20:35 AM
Re:CodeGear and Beta Testing
"Francois Malan" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
Quote
quality. The current status of D2006 with all updates and hotfixes so far is still only up to release-candidate quality. Unless CodeGear aim for the quality of the initial release of Delphi 2007 to be at least 'Release Candidate' standard any beta will be a complete waste of time. Maybe I am old-fashioned but my notion of a 'beta' is that the addition of features has been frozen, internal QA has been completed and all reproducible bugs have been fixed. All that remains is to iron out any wrinkles caused by unpredictable use in unpredicatable environments that are encountered in the field as opposed to a controlled lab environment. Anything less is an alpha or a 'tech preview' (like D8). CodeGear are making all the right noises - I only hope they live up to their promise. |
Diego
![]() Delphi Developer |
2006-11-21 08:03:37 AM
Re:CodeGear and Beta Testing
Eivind Bakkestuen writes:
Quote>Personally I'd like to see a more open strategy regarding beta |
Craig
![]() Delphi Developer |
2006-11-21 08:06:08 AM
Re:CodeGear and Beta TestingQuote
|
Diego
![]() Delphi Developer |
2006-11-21 08:31:25 AM
Re:CodeGear and Beta Testing
Joanna Carter [TeamB] writes:
Quote"Francois Malan" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>a écrit dans le company out, not the other way around? Or is beta testing not seen as something worthwhile and just something to appease customers? Does the company not benefit from beta programs? |
Craig
![]() Delphi Developer |
2006-11-21 08:52:05 AM
Re:CodeGear and Beta TestingQuote> useful information that closed beta testers don't find. This is worth it for Vista because of the large and varied amount of environments it needs to support. |
Wayne Niddery [TeamB]
![]() Delphi Developer |
2006-11-21 09:13:17 AM
Re:CodeGear and Beta Testing
Diego writes:
Quote
pirate distribution*. Nothing was said against any other beta testers. -- Wayne Niddery - Winwright, Inc (www.winwright.ca) "Nurture your mind with great thoughts. To believe in the heroic makes heroes." - Benjamin Disraeli |
Nathaniel L. Walker
![]() Delphi Developer |
2006-11-21 09:59:18 AM
Re:CodeGear and Beta Testing
Not to mention the free marketing MS gets from the Open Betas.
- Nate. "Craig" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes Quote
|
Diego
![]() Delphi Developer |
2006-11-21 10:22:59 AM
Re:CodeGear and Beta Testing
Wayne Niddery [TeamB] writes:
QuoteDiego writes: |
Craig
![]() Delphi Developer |
2006-11-21 12:13:47 PM
Re:CodeGear and Beta Testing
Nathaniel L. Walker writes:
QuoteNot to mention the free marketing MS gets from the Open Betas. |