Board index » delphi » Re: Pascal family of languages is getting crowded :-)

Re: Pascal family of languages is getting crowded :-)


2005-01-12 01:54:12 AM
delphi77
Nick Hodges [TeamB] writes:
Quote
Maxwell Smart writes:

>Nor do I need to.
>Nor do I want to.

I bet I use the Refactoring menu 50 times a day.
Not 50 times, but at least 20 to 30 times a day. Once you are hooked,
you can not do without it anymore. <g>
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] rvelthuis.bei.t-online.de
"Your Highness, I have no need of this hypothesis."
-- Pierre Laplace (1749-1827), to Napoleon on why his works on
celestial
mechanics make no mention of God.
 
 

Re: Pascal family of languages is getting crowded :-)

Joanna Carter (TeamB) writes:
Quote
No brackets are cool ? :-)
Lots of really good language ideas originated with SmallTalk. I would love
to have some people who are academically inclined toward language
engineering to be using our IDE.
--
John Kaster blogs.borland.com/johnk
Features and bugs: qc.borland.com
Get source: cc.borland.com
What's going on? calendar.borland.com
 

Re: Pascal family of languages is getting crowded :-)

Joanna Carter (TeamB) writes:
Quote
"John Kaster (Borland)" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>a écrit dans le message
de news: 41e35b9b$XXXX@XXXXX.COM...

>that would be indeed be cool.

No brackets are cool ? :-)
I love Smalltalk for its very simple philosophy that (almost)
everything is an object, and how this makes it a very powerful language
with a very nice syntax.
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] rvelthuis.bei.t-online.de
"I failed to make the chess team because of my height." -- Woody Allen
 

Re: Pascal family of languages is getting crowded :-)

Quote
Maybe it should be reanamed to Delphi non-tech-bash. : - )
could be if there was not that [MS] yesmen crowd.
 

Re: Pascal family of languages is getting crowded :-)

Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] writes:
Quote
for its very simple philosophy that (almost) everything is an object,
and how this makes it a very powerful language with a very nice
syntax.
Hm.. sounds familiar.. :)
--
Ingvar Nilsen
 

Re: Pascal family of languages is getting crowded :-)

John Kaster (Borland) writes:
Quote
Lots of really good language ideas originated with SmallTalk.
This sounds like a language I should be investigating... wait who am I
kidding? I should finish the other things on my TODO list first (master
ECO II, try out Unit Testing, learn C++, finish Budget app...)
--
Cheers,
David Clegg
XXXX@XXXXX.COM
 

Re: Pascal family of languages is getting crowded :-)

On 11 Jan 2005 07:36:57 -0800, "David Farrell-Garcia"
<XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes:
Quote
but suffice it to say that
.Net has some very high benefits for the right kind of application
which is the kind of applications most commonly built with Delphi
anyway.
This is the same rhetoric I keep hearing from people in dot net land.
"Dot net has some very high benefits for the right kind of
application...blah blah blah...", ad naseum.
Just once I would like it if one of these dot net advocates could give me
a single meaningful example as to what they could do WITH dot net,
versus what couldn't be done otherwise without it.
Ever since the year 2000 when dot garbage was announced, I have been
waiting, but nobody has been able to provide me with anything yet.
 

Re: Pascal family of languages is getting crowded :-)

"Nick Hodges [TeamB]" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
Quote
Captain Jake writes:

>Nobody in Stalin's Russia was forced to do anything either, since
>they all had the choice to conform or be imprisoned.

I don't buy that. It is force when they say "do this or die" or even
"do this or be imprisoned". The use of physical coercion clearly is
"force".
You'd be surprised how much you can destroy someone's freedom without ever
using any physical force.
 

Re: Pascal family of languages is getting crowded :-)

On 11 Jan 2005 07:42:57 -0800, "David Farrell-Garcia"
<XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes:
Quote
The load time is most affected by any 3rd party components you have
installed. Without that they all load quite fast, or at least fast
enough.
I've configured my D2005 to have the identical component packages as
my D6. And even then, my D2005 takes half as long to load as D6.
Quote
I really don't understand all the discussion about the load
time of Delphi. How many times do you have to start it each day?
That's not the point.
I've already stated earlier that a load time of 60 seconds versus a
load time of 9 seconds isn't going to make or break your day.
The point is simply to illustrate that if you crud up an application
with unnecessary garbage, one of the most notable side effects is the
load time. This is clearly the case with D2005 and dot net installed,
which takes about 6 times as long to load as without it.
For a purely Win32 development environment, this is neither acceptable
nor desirable.
Quote
I found it humerous when I was discussing .Net with a Delphi developer
friend the other day. Like you, he used the term "pollution" when
discussing all the .Net stuff installed by Delphi 2005, but he thinks
nothing about downloading tons of .mpg files via peer to peer and
visiting sites that swamp his machine with cookies.
Cookies don't slow down your system.
They don't add hundreds of megs to your hard drive scattered across
thousands of individual files.
Cookies aren't installed onto your system under the pretence that
they're "needed".
Furthermore, cookies can be disabled with ease, just as any useless
feature SHOULD be.
 

Re: Pascal family of languages is getting crowded :-)

On 11 Jan 2005 07:48:33 -0800, "David Farrell-Garcia"
<XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes:
Quote
That really isn't fair. That is an indication of the size of the
company and the product, for the most part. It takes much longer to
move product changes through a larger corp. When my customers report a
bug I generally have a patch on our support site within 24 hours
becuase I don't have anyone to answer to.
Throughout the years, I have never found myself complaining or grumbling
about the time that it takes Borland to release updates.
But your assertion about time and how it relates to a product's size
or company's size isn't really valid, although it is an excuse that
many companies love to use over and over again.
Allow me to illustrate..
Microsoft (love 'em or hate 'em), can put out patches immediately when
needed. They don't make you wait for the next major service pack
release which is often many months away.
Why couldn't Borland do this when a serious bug is discovered? Of
course they could...with ease. But for one reason or another, they
don't...and it most likely has to do with corporate beaurocracy.
Nothing else.
We could just as easily be receiving weekly patches from Borland.
Then when the next major service pack is ready, all of those
previously-released patches would of course be integrated into the
service pack. But for those people who are extremely frustrated by
certain bugs, it would be very comforting to know that they can get
timely support in the here and now, as opposed to "some day".
 

Re: Pascal family of languages is getting crowded :-)

Maxwell Smart writes:
Quote
Just once I would like it if one of these dot net advocates could give me
a single meaningful example as to what they could do WITH dot net,
versus what couldn't be done otherwise without it.
I just built an ASP.NET application in about 1/3 the time it would take
to do it with almost any other tool -- at least that was my estimate.
It sure kicks ass on any other web development tool.
Personally, I will do any of my personal development in .Net going
forward, simply because it is so much easier to develop with.
But you of course can do as you please. I'd ask that you take the
same attitude, though.
--
Nick Hodges -- TeamB
Lemanix Corporation -- www.lemanix.com
Read my Blog -- www.lemanix.com/nick
 

Re: Pascal family of languages is getting crowded :-)

On 11 Jan 2005 08:32:54 -0800, "Nick Hodges [TeamB]"
<XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes:
Quote
I bet I use the Refactoring menu 50 times a day.
What possible reason could you have for using it 50 times a day?
 

Re: Pascal family of languages is getting crowded :-)

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 18:54:12 +0100, "Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]"
<XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes:
Quote
Not 50 times, but at least 20 to 30 times a day. Once you are hooked,
you can not do without it anymore. <g>
I'll pose the same question to you, as well.
What possible reason could you have for using it 20 or 30 times a day?
 

Re: Pascal family of languages is getting crowded :-)

Maxwell Smart writes:
Quote
What possible reason could you have for using it 50 times a day?
Declare Variable, Rename Variable, Extract Method. Use them all the
time. I am more and more dependent on it, and I find myself coding
faster when I am using it. CRTL+SHIFT+V, Enter makes things go really
quickly.
I code with "Extract Method" in mind. Makes for much cleaner code.
As Morpheus said, "Free your mind, Neo".
--
Nick Hodges -- TeamB
Lemanix Corporation -- www.lemanix.com
Read my Blog -- www.lemanix.com/nick
 

Re: Pascal family of languages is getting crowded :-)

Maxwell Smart writes:
Quote
Of
course they could...with ease.
Well, that is a bit presumptuous. Putting out a patch takes a lot of
work.
--
Nick Hodges -- TeamB
Lemanix Corporation -- www.lemanix.com
Read my Blog -- www.lemanix.com/nick