Board index » delphi » Re: To TeamB

Re: To TeamB


2005-07-11 01:23:32 AM
delphi148
Quote
My reply was "schmonk".
It is close to "schmuck", which does have a derogatory meaning, and close spelling might warrant cancellation.
Kevin
--
Software for resource managers and researchers
www.ecostats.com
 
 

Re: To TeamB

Quote
It is close to "schmuck", which does have a derogatory meaning, and
close spelling might warrant cancellation.
Looks to me like severe case of paranoia.
Kostya
 

Re: To TeamB

Kostya writes:
Quote
>It is close to "schmuck", which does have a derogatory meaning, and
>close spelling might warrant cancellation.

Looks to me like severe case of paranoia.
Severe case of Family Forum. Some keywords are frowned upon. Accept that
and grieve no further.
--
Ben
 

Re: To TeamB

Quote
Severe case of Family Forum. Some keywords are frowned upon. Accept that
and grieve no further.
No grievances. I am not the one being you know who
Kostya
 

Re: To TeamB

Kostya writes:
Quote
>Severe case of Family Forum. Some keywords are frowned upon. Accept
>that and grieve no further.

No grievances. I am not the one being you know who
My words are for everyone, including those who grieve about cancelled
posts. ;-)
--
Ben
 

Re: To TeamB

Kostya writes:
Quote
My reply was "schmonk". The word has no meaning,
nevertheless the message was canceled.
If you people consider that a personal attack
or profanity you got to be out of your mind.
Maybe they just considered it a waste of disk space.
 

Re: To TeamB

Quote
Maybe they just considered it a waste of disk space.
Nice to see you here
Kostya
 

Re: To TeamB

As compared to this thread??
"Eric Schreiber" <eric at kobayashi dot com>writes
Quote

Maybe they just considered it a waste of disk space.
 

Re: To TeamB

Kostya <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
<42d14580$XXXX@XXXXX.COM>
Quote
My reply was "schmonk". The word has no meaning,
nevertheless the message was canceled.
I thought it was a misspelling of "schmuck", which is a personal attack.
Maybe the TeamB member that canceled it thought likewise.
--
Everything in this post is mere opinion.
It might be very well formed opinion based
on an uncanny grasp of the facts, but it
remains opinion nevertheless.
Posted with Reader3000-BETA 0.9.4.966
 

Re: To TeamB

Quote
I thought it was a misspelling of "schmuck", which is a personal attack.
Maybe the TeamB member that canceled it thought likewise.
It was a meaningless rhyme to plonk. Same thing as Joe Schmoe
Kostya
 

Re: To TeamB

Kostya writes:
Quote
>I thought it was a misspelling of "schmuck", which is a personal
>attack. Maybe the TeamB member that canceled it thought likewise.


It was a meaningless rhyme to plonk. Same thing as Joe Schmoe

Kostya
PMJI, but I believe that TeamB member who cancelled
that post jumped the gun a bit. Trigger happy.
I didn't even think about it being close to "schmuck".
Context wise, plonk =>schmonk.. thank goodness
the guy who posted "plonk" didn't say "Pluck" :)
Of course, there won't be any reason to say Pluck..
Can we not just say we entered some strange Twilight
Zone and that post that was canceled was posted,
but got sucked into it even though we all returned
and most of the posts here survived the return
trip?
Just a Twilight-Zone type thought...
Edmund
 

Re: To TeamB

Quote
PMJI, but I believe that TeamB member who cancelled
that post jumped the gun a bit. Trigger happy.
That member should probably take cold shower
Kostya
 

Re: To TeamB

Kostya writes:
Quote
That member should probably take cold shower

Well, regardless. What's done is done. Nothing
we can do about it. No use crying over spilt
milk... move on from this experience.
Edmund
 

Re: To TeamB

"Ben Hochstrasser" <bhoc@tiscali123^H^H^H.ch>writes
Quote
Kostya writes:

>>It is close to "schmuck", which does have a derogatory meaning, and
>>close spelling might warrant cancellation.
>
>Looks to me like severe case of paranoia.

Severe case of Family Forum. Some keywords are frowned upon. Accept that
and grieve no further.
So how come we can read the S-word in these posts? ;-)
Is it no longer offensive since it is not aimed at anyone in particular?
--
Kirk Halgren
"I'm out to make a living, not a killing."
-- Bob Wallace, Architect for Microsoft Pascal (circa mid 1980s),
popularizer of the term 'shareware'
 

Re: To TeamB

Bob Watson writes:
Quote
>Maybe they just considered it a waste of disk space.
As compared to this thread??
This thread is worthy of being bronzed and hung on a wall, if for no
other reason than you are in it ;)