Board index » delphi » Re: D9 Rumor Mill: Multiunit namespaces, Win32 enhancements, Refactoring

Re: D9 Rumor Mill: Multiunit namespaces, Win32 enhancements, Refactoring


2004-04-22 03:52:26 PM
delphi58
Quote
>Do you want it to be? I would rather the projects appeared in order of
>dependancy as they are now, so that they are compiled in the correct
order.

I'm pretty sure what's being referred to here is the unit order within a
project, not the project order within a project group.
Well, some like to have the unit init load order as it happens on
application load!
Cheers
Hp
 
 

Re: D9 Rumor Mill: Multiunit namespaces, Win32 enhancements, Refactoring

Quote
Speaking of missing components, can anyone provide a link to the free
TeeChart Lite Delphi 8 version? The ad says available, but I can not find a
link to d/l.
It is on the Delphi 8 Partner CD:
CD-Drive:\steema_software\teechart_lite_for_net
Jan
 

Re: D9 Rumor Mill: Multiunit namespaces, Win32 enhancements, Refactoring

It would only be sorted in the display list, it wouldn't need to alter the
project source (which would be disasterous).
--
Pete
-------
www.DroopyEyes.com
Audio compression components, DIB Controls, FastStrings
www.HowToDoThings.com
Read or write articles on just about anything
"Cruxy" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
Quote
>..but will the Project Manager be sorted alphabetically <g>

Please ONLY if the Project's source file is UNCHANGED!!!! Or make an
option to change the behaviour!!

regards

--
cruxyATcruxyDOTnet
DO NOT SEND SPAM E-MAILS!!

XanaNews 1.16.3.1
 

Re: D9 Rumor Mill: Multiunit namespaces, Win32 enhancements, Refactoring

"Chee Wee" writes
Quote
>
>I think D9 could be closer than we think... Perhaps Delphi might go on
>a JBuilder'esk release streak for a couple of releases.

True, since one of the Borlander's posted a "beta tester needed" blog
entry. Typically, that would mean a new release can be expected within
6-9 months.

Taking into account death of CBuilder
and Kylix, it is reasonable expectation,
from technical resources point of view.
And with recent pushing of Software Assurance
in every given situation, it kind of show that
there might be a bussines decision also.
 

Re: D9 Rumor Mill: Multiunit namespaces, Win32 enhancements, Refactoring

Quote
But Delphi 8 just shipped! I have to pay for another upgrade? I just upgraded.
x-(
Kyle,
actually I think you did not upgrade but buy a completly new product ;-) out
of a new Borland product line.
cu,
Michael
 

Re: D9 Rumor Mill: Multiunit namespaces, Win32 enhancements, Refactoring

In article <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>,
XXXX@XXXXX.COM says...
Hi,
Quote
>..but will the Project Manager be sorted alphabetically <g>

Do you want it to be? I would rather the projects appeared in order of
dependancy as they are now, so that they are compiled in the correct order.
I meant the units of a project, not the projects themselves.
Phil
--
Discover a lost art - play Marbles
May 2004
www.marillion.com
 

Re: D9 Rumor Mill: Multiunit namespaces, Win32 enhancements, Refactoring

Hp writes:
Quote
>>Do you want it to be? I would rather the projects appeared in order of
>>dependancy as they are now, so that they are compiled in the correct
>order.
>
>I'm pretty sure what's being referred to here is the unit order within a
>project, not the project order within a project group.

Well, some like to have the unit init load order as it happens on
application load!
At least that would be better than the "order the unit was added" which d7
currently defaults to...
-Gary
 

Re: D9 Rumor Mill: Multiunit namespaces, Win32 enhancements, Refactoring

David Clegg writes:
Fatal error: Cannot redeclare msg() (previously declared in
/home/abauer/blogkomm/module/blogkomm_show_link.php:80) in
/home/abauer/blogkomm/module/blogkomm_show_link.php on line 80
Nope, it is not completely fixed yet!!!!
Andrew
 

Re: D9 Rumor Mill: Multiunit namespaces, Win32 enhancements, Refactoring

Kyle A. Miller writes:
Quote
I have to pay for another upgrade?
No, actually you only have to pay if you choose to.
--
Nick Hodges -- TeamB
Lemanix Corporation -- www.lemanix.com
Read my Blog -- www.lemanix.com/nick
 

Re: D9 Rumor Mill: Multiunit namespaces, Win32 enhancements, Refactoring

"David Clegg" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
Quote
JED writes:

>and with the vast use of pointers, getting it all managed code would
>take quite an effort.

Perhaps it could be wrapped in an ActiveX control which could then be
used by Delphi 8 and other .NET languages.
Ugh. I think I might have to fashion something on my own. Unless version 1.0
makes enough money to finance buying a really good commercial component for
the task.
 

Re: D9 Rumor Mill: Multiunit namespaces, Win32 enhancements, Refactoring

Jan Mitrovics writes:
Quote

It is on the Delphi 8 Partner CD:
CD-Drive:\steema_software\teechart_lite_for_net

Thank you!
 

Re: D9 Rumor Mill: Multiunit namespaces, Win32 enhancements, Refactoring

"Kyle A. Miller" <kyle#XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes:
Quote
Ok, dbExpress is provided, but with no MS SQL driver.
Delphi 7 has a dbEpxress driver for MS SQL. Delphi 8 has dbExpress.
--
Dave Nottage (TeamB)
 

Re: D9 Rumor Mill: Multiunit namespaces, Win32 enhancements, Refactoring

"Dave Nottage (TeamB)" <XXXX@XXXXX.COM>writes
Quote
>Ok, dbExpress is provided, but with no MS SQL driver.

Delphi 7 has a dbEpxress driver for MS SQL. Delphi 8 has dbExpress.

Not to mention 3rd party drivers, such as CoreLabs, provide a DBX driver for
MS SQL.
--
Dan Miser
www.distribucon.com
 

Re: D9 Rumor Mill: Multiunit namespaces, Win32 enhancements, Refactoring

Dave Nottage (TeamB) writes:
Quote
Delphi 7 has a dbEpxress driver for MS SQL. Delphi 8 has dbExpress.

Yes, but we were told to say good bye to SQL Links when Delphi 6 came out, so
we started a new project using ADO to support MS SQL. Initially, we did
as Dan Miser suggested and bought 3rd party dbExpress MS SQL driver. It
had threading issues, so we had to give up and go ADO.
 

Re: D9 Rumor Mill: Multiunit namespaces, Win32 enhancements, Refactoring

"Kyle A. Miller" <kyle@millerdevelopment##remove#.info>writes
Quote
Initially, we did
as Dan Miser suggested and bought 3rd party dbExpress MS SQL driver. It
had threading issues, so we had to give up and go ADO.

Interesting. I am guessing that was early on? We had to go with the CoreLab
driver for one client since we were stuck with D6, and the results were
rather good. I reported several bugs, and got pretty good turn-around. And
having the source sure helped since I didn't have to wait for them to fix it
there first. ;-)
--
Dan Miser
www.distribucon.com