Board index » cppbuilder » Re: bcc32pch 2.6dev 12

2006-04-05 10:38:41 PM
cppbuilder20
Hello Andreas,
in dev 12 it is gone.
Now dev 12 works here one day without further errors, but still a little bit
slower than dev 5, maybe it has to do with the textattributes in the output
window, I will do more tests.
Greetings,
Harald
 

Harald Plontke wrote:
bcc32pch configuration dialog.
--
Regards,
Andreas Hausladen
(andy.jgknet.de/blog)
 

But I like the bugfixes, so I stay with dev 12.
Greetings,
Harald
 

{smallsort}

On Wed, 5 Apr 2006 17:54:49 +0200, "Andreas Hausladen"
< XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote:
what is the way to pass additional parameters to individual projects?
for example if I like to use alternate linker for some project I use
Project - Execute Makefile and pass -DLINKER=<linker name>but it
isn't very convenient since it always remember latest executed
makefile (instead of currently selected project in project group which
might be useful) and I'd like to simply hit something like F9 in order
to automatically make project and run it to debug within IDE
--
Vladimir Ulchenko aka vavan
 

vavan wrote:
--
Regards,
Andreas Hausladen
(andy.jgknet.de/blog)
 

On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 17:49:50 +0200, "Andreas Hausladen"
< XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote:
another question is how to use LibExportRemover?
another problem I often encounter is that when project has compilation
errors and I double click on error in message window IDE highlights
wrong line though error message usually contains correct line number.
do you know what might cause such annoying misbehaviour?
thank you
--
Vladimir Ulchenko aka vavan
 

vavan wrote:
Delphi compiler can't handle them. But I don't think that the C++ Compiler
has problems with Unit line breaks.
--
Regards,
Andreas Hausladen
(andy.jgknet.de/blog)
 

On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 14:19:22 +0200, "Andreas Hausladen"
< XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote:
after I start using some templatized code etc.
--
Vladimir Ulchenko aka vavan
 

On Thu, 6 Apr 2006 17:49:50 +0200, "Andreas Hausladen"
< XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote:
another suggestion: introducing build configurations in bds is a step
to right direction from borland but they somehow forgot to allow
customization of used packages in project. so you either enable or
disable packages for your project (including all build configs)
I don't like it and usually create simple header file:
#ifndef COMMON_PROJECTNAME_H
#define COMMON_PROJECTNAME_H
// some project specific defines
#ifdef STATIC_BUILD
#pragma comment(lib,"package1.lib")
#pragma comment(lib,"package2.lib")
...
#pragma comment(lib,"packageN.lib")
#else
#pragma comment(lib,"package1.bpi")
#pragma comment(lib,"package2.bpi")
...
#pragma comment(lib,"packageN.bpi")
#endif
#endif
so one can uncheck 'Build with run-time packages' in project settings
once and simply define STATIC_BUILD for some configs in order to get
statically linked app
now the only problem is that your mak-file generator takes build-node
named 'libraries' where ide places package1.lib, packageN.lib when
aforementioned switch unchecked so I have to manually remove those
names from ALLLIB section of generated mak-file
it would be great if you supported such build model
what do you think?
--
Vladimir Ulchenko aka vavan