Board index » cppbuilder » Re: C++Builder survey

Re: C++Builder survey


2005-02-23 05:00:04 AM
cppbuilder107
"Michael Gillen" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote in
Quote
Brion L. Webster wrote:

>
>"However, people on THIS newsgroup have NO excuse for not looking
>at EventCentral." (meaning the Delphi non-tech ng)
>
>The same thing obviously applies to this newsgroup as well. Seems
>like C++ folks should be checking BDN, regardless of their
>preferred mechanism of communicating with Borland, since no one
>bothered pointing out the survey.
>

I had quit looking at BDN because it was a graveyard as far as
C++Builder info. I guess I'll start monitoring again.

That's my excuse as well -- for more than a year, there was no C++-
related news on BDN, so I just quit checking there.
mr_organic
 
 

Re:Re: C++Builder survey

Want to really tweak John? Ask if it's been put on Borland Direct
yet... <G>
David Erbas-White
mr_organic wrote:
Quote
"Michael Gillen" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote in
news:421b9c36$ XXXX@XXXXX.COM :


>Brion L. Webster wrote:
>
>
>>"However, people on THIS newsgroup have NO excuse for not looking
>>at EventCentral." (meaning the Delphi non-tech ng)
>>
>>The same thing obviously applies to this newsgroup as well. Seems
>>like C++ folks should be checking BDN, regardless of their
>>preferred mechanism of communicating with Borland, since no one
>>bothered pointing out the survey.
>>
>
>I had quit looking at BDN because it was a graveyard as far as
>C++Builder info. I guess I'll start monitoring again.
>


That's my excuse as well -- for more than a year, there was no C++-
related news on BDN, so I just quit checking there.

mr_organic
 

Re:Re: C++Builder survey

David Erbas-White wrote:
Quote
Want to really tweak John? Ask if it's been put on Borland Direct
yet... <G>

[snip]
What about quoting properly?
Thanx,
.a
 

{smallsort}

Re:Re: C++Builder survey

Alex Bakaev [TeamB] wrote:
Quote

What about quoting properly?

Thanx,
.a
You're correct, I apologize. I realized it the instant I hit send, and
decided to not make matters worse by 'adding' to it.
I've done the 'hit send early' a bit too often lately, I'll do my best
to correct it.
David Erbas-White
 

Re:Re: C++Builder survey

David Erbas-White wrote:
Quote
Want to really tweak John? Ask if it's been put on Borland Direct
yet... <G>
news.borland.com
--
John Kaster blogs.borland.com/johnk
Features and bugs: qc.borland.com
Get source: cc.borland.com
If it's not here, it's not happening: ec.borland.com
 

Re:Re: C++Builder survey

David Erbas-White wrote:
Quote

I've done the 'hit send early' a bit too often lately, I'll do my best
to correct it.


We all can relate to that, I bet ;o)
.a
 

Re:Re: C++Builder survey

BigStew wrote:
Quote
bdn.borland.com/article/0,1410,32982,00.html

Funny thing is, I only found out about this survey in the Delphi non-tech
group.
No mention of it in the Builder groups?

Just wondering, will it be possible to see the survey results.
Thanks!
Jonathan Neve.
 

Re:Re: C++Builder survey

Jonathan Neve < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote:
Quote
[...]
Just wondering, will it be possible to see the survey results.
Publishing survey results?
How come I have this feeling of deja vu?
Quote
Jonathan Neve.
Schobi
--
XXXX@XXXXX.COM is never read
I'm Schobi at suespammers dot org
"The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely
to be prefered to those thinking they've found it."
Terry Pratchett
 

Re:Re: C++Builder survey

Jonathan Neve wrote:
Quote
>

Just wondering, will it be possible to see the survey results.

Thanks!
Jonathan Neve.
Don't you DARE get me started on this subject...
David Erbas-White