Board index » cppbuilder » Re: Attention please!

Re: Attention please!


2004-05-29 05:38:46 AM
cppbuilder99
Rudy Velthuis (TeamB) wrote:
Quote
<groan>
OMG, a groaning dentist.
--
Ken
planeta.terra.com.br/educacao/kencamargo/
* this is not a sig *
 
 

Re:Re: Attention please!

At 23:36:07, 28.05.2004, Kenneth de Camargo wrote:
Quote
>Remy, it was a joke, I'm sure. <g>

It's not his fault, Des should have issued an Open Letter stating his
intentions first.
<groan>
--
Rudy Velthuis (TeamB)
"We have art to save ourselves from the truth."
- Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900)
 

Re:Re: Attention please!

Rudy Velthuis (TeamB) wrote:
Quote
>OMG, a groaning dentist.
Better than a joking doctor. <g>
As long as (a) you're not the patient and (b) the joke's not on you, no
probs. The other way, however, can be pretty scary.
--
Ken
planeta.terra.com.br/educacao/kencamargo/
* this is not a sig *
 

{smallsort}

Re:Re: Attention please!

At 23:38:46, 28.05.2004, Kenneth de Camargo wrote:
Quote
Rudy Velthuis (TeamB) wrote:

><groan>

OMG, a groaning dentist.
Better than a joking doctor. <g>
--
Rudy Velthuis (TeamB)
"One word sums up probably the responsibility of any Governor, and that
one word is 'to be prepared'." -- George W. Bush
 

Re:Re: Attention please!

Rudy Velthuis (TeamB) wrote:
Quote
At 23:42:56, 28.05.2004, Kenneth de Camargo wrote:

>Rudy Velthuis (TeamB) wrote:
>
>>>OMG, a groaning dentist.
>>Better than a joking doctor. <g>
>
>As long as (a) you're not the patient and (b) the joke's not on
>you, no probs. The other way, however, can be pretty scary.

Yup!
Especially in the OR... <g>
--
Ken
planeta.terra.com.br/educacao/kencamargo/
* this is not a sig *
 

Re:Re: Attention please!

At 23:42:56, 28.05.2004, Kenneth de Camargo wrote:
Quote
Rudy Velthuis (TeamB) wrote:

>>OMG, a groaning dentist.
>Better than a joking doctor. <g>

As long as (a) you're not the patient and (b) the joke's not on you, no
probs. The other way, however, can be pretty scary.
Yup!
--
Rudy Velthuis (TeamB)
"Woman was God's second mistake."
-- Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900)
 

Re:Re: Attention please!

BigStew wrote:
Quote
Why don't we try to guess what the open letter will be?
I think it will be the letter "T".
Nah, T is a closed shape. Go for something like U
--
Vesty.
 

Re:Re: Attention please!

Adam Versteegen wrote:
Quote
BigStew wrote:

>Why don't we try to guess what the open letter will be?
>I think it will be the letter "T".

Nah, T is a closed shape. Go for something like U
The bottom is closed too. I insist on "I".
--
Ken
planeta.terra.com.br/educacao/kencamargo/
* this is not a sig *
 

Re:Re: Attention please!

It will be the letter "H" since it is open at both top and bottom...
David Erbas-White
Kenneth de Camargo wrote:
Quote
Adam Versteegen wrote:


>BigStew wrote:
>
>
>>Why don't we try to guess what the open letter will be?
>>I think it will be the letter "T".
>
>Nah, T is a closed shape. Go for something like U


The bottom is closed too. I insist on "I".

 

Re:Re: Attention please!

David Erbas-White wrote:
Quote
It will be the letter "H" since it is open at both top and bottom...
But it's closed at the sides.
--
Ken
planeta.terra.com.br/educacao/kencamargo/
* this is not a sig *
 

Re:Re: Attention please!

Quote
But it's closed at the sides.
X then?
Tom
 

Re:Re: Attention please!

Evil, Evil ;-)
Saulo I. Regis wrote:
Quote
Oh... is Boian emulating that "Emulator" discussion now regarding compilers
and interpreters.

I don't know how to interprete his engagement on it!

Saulo


 

Re:Re: Attention please!

"Kenneth de Camargo" wrote:
Quote
What? No booze? Jeez, what a dump...
Sorry, this is a family forum. But the contest for the oldest programmer
here is still open.<g>
Peter
 

Re:Re: Attention please!

Why don't we all contribute a sentence each to the open letter. I'll start
off with:
From the moment we published the first open letter, we knew that there would
be many revisions and upheavals before we could publish the second one.
Someone care for the second sentence...
Brent
"BigStew" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote in message
Quote
Why don't we try to guess what the open letter will be?
I think it will be the letter "T".

Stew

"Peter Agricola" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote in message
news: XXXX@XXXXX.COM ...
>May I have your special attention please! While we are all waiting for
the
>Open Letter to arrive...
>Peter
>
>


 

Re:Re: Attention please!

"Brent" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote:
Quote
From the moment we published the first open letter, we knew that there would
be many revisions and upheavals before we could publish the second one.
Geopolitical uncertainties and the rumored passing of Bjorn
Stroustup have made us reconsider many times what we are doing and why, shifting our corporate strategies into and out of
focus and posing great challenges to Borland's management
compass.