Board index » cppbuilder » Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?
Tom Corey
![]() CBuilder Developer |
Tom Corey
![]() CBuilder Developer |
Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?2008-02-29 11:33:48 PM cppbuilder46 Glynn Owen wrote: Quote"overpriced and out of reach" is pretty much the way I see it Turno editions - but not at all costly for a professional developer who expects or intends to make money with it. As business expenses go, that's miniscule. If a professional developer cannot afford that, he's doing something wrong. |
Brandon Staggs
![]() CBuilder Developer |
2008-02-29 11:48:37 PM
Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?
"Marc Rohloff [TeamB]" wrote on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:47:10 -0500:
QuoteOn Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:43:03 -0600, TJC Support wrote: wanted to, the time it would take to re-design my projects in VS would make it an insane thing to do. And the $3-400 annual subscription I pay for Delphi Pro is not a significant cost for any real business. However, if I were just starting out on a shoestring budget, I wouldn't be able to justify using Delphi, because Microsoft hands out free copies of VS at trade shows, etc. I couldn't justify using Delphi when I have a copy of VS that Microsoft already gave me. Add to that the complete dearth of educational material for Delphi compared to MS tools, and it just wouldn't make sense to start out fresh with Delphi, regardless of how superior you and I know it to be. CodeGear is not going to lose me as a customer, and I actually *like* using Delphi anyway. But I just don't see how they are going to attract a significant share of new customers. -- Brandon Staggs www.swordsearcher.com www.studylamp.com www.brandonstaggs.com |
Marius
![]() CBuilder Developer |
2008-03-01 12:23:16 AM
Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?
"And meanwhile over the years their prices have climbed higher and
higher to the point that typical individuals just can't afford them" He does have a point here. There *was* a time i would consider buying it personally, but that has stopped for the obvious. However, slow install, 8 months of disturbing 2007 bugs and failing help also doesnt improve upgrade decisions. At least there is a trial to find out such.. {smallsort} |
Marius
![]() CBuilder Developer |
2008-03-01 12:28:47 AM
Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?
Sorry Bruce, should have replied on Remy
|
Andy Syms
![]() CBuilder Developer |
2008-03-01 12:29:47 AM
Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?
Kent Briggs wrote:
QuoteHe's absolutely right about that. (of the Pro SKU) to be just about right. -- Andy Syms Technosoft Systems Ltd |
Kent Briggs
![]() CBuilder Developer |
2008-03-01 12:34:58 AM
Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?Quote>> smaller individual developers. <<< He's absolutely right about that. -- Kent Briggs, XXXX@XXXXX.COM Briggs Softworks, www.briggsoft.com |
Alex Bakaev [TeamB]
![]() CBuilder Developer |
2008-03-01 01:26:24 AM
Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?
Kent Briggs wrote:
Quote
www.turboexplorer.com/cpp |
David Erbas-White
![]() CBuilder Developer |
2008-03-01 01:43:23 AM
Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?
Andy Syms wrote:
QuoteKent Briggs wrote: Seriously. There's been lots of stuff added since my previous 'heavy' use version (version 5), and now I use BDS2007 as my primary package. But there is little/no documentation on items that have been added in the interim -- and expecting the user to 'experiment' to find out how things work, what they do, etc., is FAR more expensive than the price of the product. David Erbas-White |
TJC Support
![]() CBuilder Developer |
2008-03-01 01:46:40 AM
Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?
"Brandon Staggs" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote in message
Quote
idea to have a low priced entry level version that users can do something productive with, to get them hooked. Also freebies for students and teachers. Cheers, Van |
Kent Briggs
![]() CBuilder Developer |
2008-03-01 02:02:59 AM
Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?
Andy Syms wrote:
QuoteKent Briggs wrote: started with a very affordable Turbo Pascal 2.0 twenty years ago), you'll be sorry then. -- Kent Briggs, XXXX@XXXXX.COM Briggs Softworks, www.briggsoft.com |
Brian Moelk
![]() CBuilder Developer |
2008-03-01 02:31:03 AM
Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?
Charles B wrote:
QuoteNo, of course not, but you may care sometime in the future when Codegear has but I'd get over it. QuoteLargely supposition of course, but that is what has happened in the -- Brian Moelk Brain Endeavor LLC XXXX@XXXXX.COM |
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
![]() CBuilder Developer |
2008-03-01 02:50:28 AM
Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?
David Erbas-White wrote:
QuoteI'm not as concerned about the price as I am about the lack of good Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] www.teamb.com "Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read." -- Groucho Marx |
David Erbas-White
![]() CBuilder Developer |
2008-03-01 02:53:38 AM
Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] wrote:
QuoteDavid Erbas-White wrote: Secondly, the very fact that you, Rudy, of TeamB fame, have to add the "I guess," shows how poorly CodeGear is doing in even COMMUNICATING to folks that these problems ARE being addressed. David Erbas-White |
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
![]() CBuilder Developer |
2008-03-01 02:57:27 AM
Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?
David Erbas-White wrote:
QuoteFirst of all, this has been a major complaint for SEVERAL YEARS. see a good reason to keep riding on that. I'm sure you also knew it. -- Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] www.teamb.com "In the End, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends." -- Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968) |
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB]
![]() CBuilder Developer |
2008-03-01 02:59:22 AM
Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?
David Erbas-White wrote:
QuoteSecondly, the very fact that you, Rudy, of TeamB fame, have to add -- Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] www.teamb.com "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim." -- Edsger Dijkstra |