Board index » cppbuilder » Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?

Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?


2008-02-29 11:33:48 PM
cppbuilder46
Glynn Owen wrote:
Quote
"overpriced and out of reach" is pretty much the way I see it
Eh? Delphi 2007 for Win32, Professional, new user price from Codegear
is $874. Perhaps pricey for a hobbyist - who can instead use the free
Turno editions - but not at all costly for a professional developer who
expects or intends to make money with it. As business expenses go,
that's miniscule.
If a professional developer cannot afford that, he's doing something
wrong.
 
 

Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?

"Marc Rohloff [TeamB]" wrote on Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:47:10 -0500:
Quote
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:43:03 -0600, TJC Support wrote:

>Since Delphi Pro costs less than 1 day of my time, and saves me at least 1
>day of productivity for every week I use it as compared to my experiences
>with Visual C++ when I had to use it for a project, I consider it to be one
>of the cheapest tools on my computer. If I were a programming hobbyist, I'm
>sure I'd look at it differently, but for use in a commercial enterprise, it
>still can't be beat.

That's pretty much how I feel, there is no other tool that I would
consider acceptable for Win32 development, especially now that
Microsoft did CodeGear a favour and took VB out of the game. (I've
also suffered the trials of Visual C++)
I agree completely, but the harsh reality is that Delphi can't compete
like that. There is no way I could "switch" to VS, and even if I
wanted to, the time it would take to re-design my projects in VS would
make it an insane thing to do. And the $3-400 annual subscription I
pay for Delphi Pro is not a significant cost for any real business.
However, if I were just starting out on a shoestring budget, I
wouldn't be able to justify using Delphi, because Microsoft hands out
free copies of VS at trade shows, etc. I couldn't justify using
Delphi when I have a copy of VS that Microsoft already gave me. Add
to that the complete dearth of educational material for Delphi
compared to MS tools, and it just wouldn't make sense to start out
fresh with Delphi, regardless of how superior you and I know it to be.
CodeGear is not going to lose me as a customer, and I actually *like*
using Delphi anyway. But I just don't see how they are going to
attract a significant share of new customers.
--
Brandon Staggs
www.swordsearcher.com
www.studylamp.com
www.brandonstaggs.com
 

Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?

"And meanwhile over the years their prices have climbed higher and
higher to the point that typical individuals just can't afford them"
He does have a point here. There *was* a time i would consider buying it
personally, but that has stopped for the obvious.
However, slow install, 8 months of disturbing 2007 bugs and failing help
also doesnt improve upgrade decisions. At least there is a trial to find
out such..
 

{smallsort}

Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?

Sorry Bruce, should have replied on Remy
 

Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?

Kent Briggs wrote:
Quote
He's absolutely right about that.
Rubbish. I'm running a one man business here and Delphi isn't even my
main development system (I do embedded software) and I find the price
(of the Pro SKU) to be just about right.
--
Andy Syms
Technosoft Systems Ltd
 

Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?

Quote
>>
The cost is just far too prohibitive for smaller organizations and
individuals. ... Borland and CodeGear have turned their backs on the
smaller individual developers.
<<<
He's absolutely right about that.
--
Kent Briggs, XXXX@XXXXX.COM
Briggs Softworks, www.briggsoft.com
 

Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?

Kent Briggs wrote:
Quote

He's absolutely right about that.

So, I suppose the free Turbo editions don't count? Frankly, this whining
is completely unjustified.
www.turboexplorer.com/cpp
 

Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?

Andy Syms wrote:
Quote
Kent Briggs wrote:

>He's absolutely right about that.

Rubbish. I'm running a one man business here and Delphi isn't even my
main development system (I do embedded software) and I find the price
(of the Pro SKU) to be just about right.

I'm not as concerned about the price as I am about the lack of good
documentation.
Seriously.
There's been lots of stuff added since my previous 'heavy' use version
(version 5), and now I use BDS2007 as my primary package. But there is
little/no documentation on items that have been added in the interim --
and expecting the user to 'experiment' to find out how things work, what
they do, etc., is FAR more expensive than the price of the product.
David Erbas-White
 

Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?

"Brandon Staggs" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote in message
Quote

However, if I were just starting out on a shoestring budget, I
wouldn't be able to justify using Delphi, because Microsoft hands out
free copies of VS at trade shows, etc. I couldn't justify using
Delphi when I have a copy of VS that Microsoft already gave me. Add
to that the complete dearth of educational material for Delphi
compared to MS tools, and it just wouldn't make sense to start out
fresh with Delphi, regardless of how superior you and I know it to be.
Excellent point. I agree that those with no prior Delphi experience would
find it hard to resist the MS "carrot" being dangled. I think it's a great
idea to have a low priced entry level version that users can do something
productive with, to get them hooked. Also freebies for students and
teachers.
Cheers,
Van
 

Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?

Andy Syms wrote:
Quote
Kent Briggs wrote:

>He's absolutely right about that.

Rubbish. I'm running a one man business here and Delphi isn't even my
main development system (I do embedded software) and I find the price
(of the Pro SKU) to be just about right.
Good for you. I doubt you're typical, though. If Borland/CodeGear goes
under because they aren't attracting young startups like they used to (I
started with a very affordable Turbo Pascal 2.0 twenty years ago),
you'll be sorry then.
--
Kent Briggs, XXXX@XXXXX.COM
Briggs Softworks, www.briggsoft.com
 

Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?

Charles B wrote:
Quote
No, of course not, but you may care sometime in the future when Codegear has
gone bust because they couldn't compete with a 'free' product from MS and
all you are left with is the choice of VS or nothing at whatever price they
then decide to charge, as there is no competition.
There are many other alternatives besides VS.NET and Delphi. Many of
them free/opensource, others built by private companies. IOW, I care,
but I'd get over it.
Quote
Largely supposition of course, but that is what has happened in the
supermarket business and others.
It's not supposition and given Borland's current financial state it's
more likely than ever.
--
Brian Moelk
Brain Endeavor LLC
XXXX@XXXXX.COM
 

Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?

David Erbas-White wrote:
Quote
I'm not as concerned about the price as I am about the lack of good
documentation.

Seriously.
No doubt. But this is still being worked on, I guess.
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] www.teamb.com
"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog,
it's too dark to read." -- Groucho Marx
 

Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?

Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] wrote:
Quote
David Erbas-White wrote:

>I'm not as concerned about the price as I am about the lack of good
>documentation.
>
>Seriously.

No doubt. But this is still being worked on, I guess.

First of all, this has been a major complaint for SEVERAL YEARS. It
shouldn't need to be something that is 'still being worked on...'
Secondly, the very fact that you, Rudy, of TeamB fame, have to add the
"I guess," shows how poorly CodeGear is doing in even COMMUNICATING to
folks that these problems ARE being addressed.
David Erbas-White
 

Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?

David Erbas-White wrote:
Quote
First of all, this has been a major complaint for SEVERAL YEARS.
Yes, this is known. And by now, it is also known there have been
considerable problems from which they are speedily recovering. I don't
see a good reason to keep riding on that. I'm sure you also knew it.
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] www.teamb.com
"In the End, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but
the silence of our friends."
-- Martin Luther King Jr. (1929-1968)
 

Re:Re: (Microsoft) The Future of Delphi?

David Erbas-White wrote:
Quote
Secondly, the very fact that you, Rudy, of TeamB fame, have to add
the "I guess,"
That just means that I am not constantly in personal touch with all
teams, nothing more. It is wrong to see more into it than just that.
--
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] www.teamb.com
"The question of whether a computer can think is no more
interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim."
-- Edsger Dijkstra