Board index » cppbuilder » Re: ANN: DDevExtensions 1.0

Re: ANN: DDevExtensions 1.0


2006-07-11 01:15:07 PM
cppbuilder15
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] wrote:
Quote
It is not entirely reliable, but in most cases it works fine. It is a
nice feature.
My feeling says that without error insight there are less dead locks in
the IDE. At least I do not have to wait that long after typing code. But
that is only a subjetive feeling and I haven't proofed that.
--
Regards,
Andreas Hausladen
(andy.jgknet.de/blog)
 
 

Re:Re: ANN: DDevExtensions 1.0

Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] wrote:
Quote
At 01:04:47, 11.07.2006, Andreas Hausladen wrote:

>BTW: This is only the first step what CompileInterceptor will allow
>me to do without modifying any file on disk or in the editor.

It will surely and thoroughly confuse error insight, though. <g>
Maybe in D2005/D2006 but surely not in Delphi 5 or 6 ?
--
 

Re:Re: ANN: DDevExtensions 1.0

"Francois Malan" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote in message
Quote
Rudy Velthuis [TeamB] wrote:

>It will surely and thoroughly confuse error insight, though. <g>

Maybe in D2005/D2006 but surely not in Delphi 5 or 6 ?
Don't forget Delphi 7, error insight doesn't exist there either.
Daniel
 

{smallsort}

Re:Re: ANN: DDevExtensions 1.0

Andreas Hausladen wrote:
...
Quote
The next version is already finished and now tested. And I'm working
on CompileInterceptor which allows me to extend the Delphi syntax
with some limitations. What about a better for-in loop for Delphi 5
to 2006 like
Wow. Ok, the source code is not compatible between two developers, but a BIG
wow nonetheless.
Ralf
 

Re:Re: ANN: DDevExtensions 1.0

you have a list group for this that I can subscribe to?
Ed Dressel
"Andreas Hausladen" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote in
message news:44b297b4$ XXXX@XXXXX.COM ...
Quote
Dave Keighan wrote:

>Excellent! Many thanks.

Then wait for the next version. It supports "simple search" and "order by
palette name" and it contains lots of bug fixes and optimizations,
especially for Delphi 2005 and BDS 2006.


--
Regards,

Andreas Hausladen
(andy.jgknet.de/blog)
 

Re:Re: ANN: DDevExtensions 1.0

I've installed Delphi Speed up for BDS2006 and it shows as registered
when I load BDS but I don't get the files progress bar when compiling
and it's still not as fast as BCB6.
I am starting BDS using the C++ personality if that makes a difference.
--
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
[Bicester, Uk]
info.borland.com/newsgroups/guide.html
 

Re:Re: ANN: DDevExtensions 1.0

Andrue Cope [TeamB] wrote:
Quote
but I don't get the files progress bar when compiling
and it's still not as fast as BCB6.
What files progress bar? bcc32pch adds a progressbar to the compile
dialog, but neither DSU nor DDevExtensions do that.
--
Regards,
Andreas Hausladen
 

Re:Re: ANN: DDevExtensions 1.0

Andreas Hausladen wrote:
Quote
>but I don't get the files progress bar when compiling
>and it's still not as fast as BCB6.

What files progress bar? bcc32pch adds a progressbar to the compile
dialog, but neither DSU nor DDevExtensions do that.
Ah yes. Hmm. Oh well. It does look a bit faster than it was but no
where near to what BCB6 now is.
--
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
[Bicester, Uk]
info.borland.com/newsgroups/guide.html
 

Re:Re: ANN: DDevExtensions 1.0

Andrue Cope [TeamB] wrote:
Quote
Ah yes. Hmm. Oh well. It does look a bit faster than it was but no
where near to what BCB6 now is.
That's because I haven't found the new bottle neck. And at the moment my
BDS 2006 isn't really able to debug any code in a dll that is loaded by
the other IDE instance. After the IDE's main form is visible I cannot set
any new breakpoint and most of the symbols are unknown to the de{*word*81}.
(Already in QC)
BTW: The IDE does some Sleep(1xxx) (where 0 <= x <= 999) immediatelly
after the splash screen is shown. That happens in sanctuarylib.dll /
vport_r_6.dll. The worst case is if you kill BDS during it's startup. Then
you have a deadlock and the IDE restarts only after a reboot (or you wait
~5 minutes).
--
Regards,
Andreas Hausladen
(andy.jgknet.de/blog)