Re:Re: BCB 2006
Dennis Jones wrote:
Quote
"Jeff Overcash (TeamB)" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote in message
news: XXXX@XXXXX.COM ...
>
>
>Dennis Jones wrote:
>>
>>
>>The only thing that is obvious from the list is that they really want
you to
>>buy SA!
>
>They have wanted you to purchase SA for a couple of releases (Since D8),
but
>since BCB hasn't been rev'd since this push I would expect BCB users to
not be
>as used to this as Delphi or JBuilder users who have seen it for a few
years
>now.
I'm curious...has SA ever been a worthwhile investment, even for Delphi
users?
Yes. If you upgrade every version, for the cost of 1 D8 + 2 SA's you would have
gotten you D8, D2005 and DeXter. It is cheaper than paying for D8 + 2
upgrades. For SA to be cheaper than upgrading every time All Borland has to do
is ship 2 versions every 3 years. Historically Delphi has shipped a new version
every 14 months. If you look at the roadmap recently available there are 3
listing in the next 2 years after DeXter (Highlander, Vista and Win64).
Quote
I suspect not, but in the event I am mistaken, how much was saved by
those who bought SA and actually had it pay off?
Typically you save 10-20% from upgrading individually over a three year period
(considering a 14 month shipping cycle). If you are in a larger company, SA is
an easier way to get approval to upgrade as accountants prefer SA over new
purchases because a) it is a known fixed cost each year and b) the cost gets
spread across the full year instead of the quarter the purchase was made in. If
you are a small shop or a single developer and you skip versions then it doesn't
make much sense.
--
Jeff Overcash (TeamB)
(Please do not email me directly unless asked. Thank You)
Your friends will know you better in the first minute you meet than your
acquaintances will know you in a thousand years. (R Bach)