Board index » cppbuilder » Re: operator overloading question

2005-03-17 09:13:46 PM
cppbuilder89
Andrue Cope [TeamB] < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote:
important advantage: If it's broken, it's
other people's responsibility to fix it.
So if it is in a library that I can use
without having to include (and use) all
the rest of the universe, if the interface
design seems sound to me, and if it does
not seem hard to get bugs fixed, I'll use
it. I have enough own code to care for.
a team, it safes a lot of time if you call
a class 'SomeSingleton'. People either know
what it is or can be pointed to google to
find out. If you name it anything without
"Singleton" in it, you'll have to explain a
lot without getting any advantage for it.
And I hate it if someone writes a comparison
function and labels it "sort".
Schobi
--
XXXX@XXXXX.COM is never read
I'm Schobi at suespammers dot org
"The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely
to be prefered to those thinking they've found it."
Terry Pratchett
 

Hendrik Schober wrote:
know the right name for anything and we usually work independantly.
--
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
[Bicester, Uk]
info.borland.com/newsgroups/guide.html
 

Andrue Cope [TeamB] < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote:
Schobi
--
XXXX@XXXXX.COM is never read
I'm Schobi at suespammers dot org
"The presence of those seeking the truth is infinitely
to be prefered to those thinking they've found it."
Terry Pratchett
 

{smallsort}

Hendrik Schober wrote:
change over the next year or so as we're now aiming for certification
and assurance. Apparently :)
--
Andrue Cope [TeamB]
[Bicester, Uk]
info.borland.com/newsgroups/guide.html