Board index » cppbuilder » ERROR loading C++ on Machines faster than 200 MH

ERROR loading C++ on Machines faster than 200 MH

had anybody an Idea whats going wrong, if i try to install
the C++ Builder 3.0 on a machine with more than 200 MH CPU

i cannot start the builder  
an a P/233 ASUS txp4 / AMD K6/233/266/300 with ATC Board )

i slowed down a 300 MH AMD to 200 MH but it doesnt run

any idea ??

 

Re:ERROR loading C++ on Machines faster than 200 MH


It's most likely to be a problem with the video card. Lot's of people with
S3 cards (especially) have problems with this. See other posts in this group
on how to get around this. (or get the latest driver for your card/ latest
S3 driver)

Rgds Pete

Quote
carsten bothe wrote in message <362331FB.99BE3...@t-online.de>...
>had anybody an Idea whats going wrong, if i try to install
>the C++ Builder 3.0 on a machine with more than 200 MH CPU

>i cannot start the builder
>an a P/233 ASUS txp4 / AMD K6/233/266/300 with ATC Board )

>i slowed down a 300 MH AMD to 200 MH but it doesnt run

>any idea ??

Re:ERROR loading C++ on Machines faster than 200 MH


Quote
>>had anybody an Idea whats going wrong, if i try to install

the C++ Builder 3.0 on a machine with more than 200 MH CPU

I'm using BCB3 on a P333 and a P400. No problems.

Quote
>>AMD K6

Mine are Intel machines, however.

--
Kent (TeamB and TurboPower Software)

Re:ERROR loading C++ on Machines faster than 200 MH


: carsten bothe <bothe-software-g...@t-online.de> wrote:

Quote
>had anybody an Idea whats going wrong, if i try to install
>the C++ Builder 3.0 on a machine with more than 200 MH CPU

>i cannot start the builder  
>an a P/233 ASUS txp4 / AMD K6/233/266/300 with ATC Board )

Is it now "Install" or "Run"?

I am running BCB 3 successfully on a PII 266 with too little RAM (64
MB)

Quote
>i slowed down a 300 MH AMD to 200 MH but it doesnt run

>any idea ??

Check your graphics card if you got BCB to install. Some cards are
pretty {*word*193} inhabitants of your system and apparently come with just
non-conformant drivers.

Search DejaNews for plenty of these discussions.

Further, if this is an installation problem,

  borland.public.install.cppbuilder

has *official* Inprise support.

--
Stefan Hoffmeister       http://www.econos.de/
No private email, please, unless expressly invited.

Re:ERROR loading C++ on Machines faster than 200 MH


On Tue, 13 Oct 1998 12:56:59 +0200, carsten bothe

Quote
<bothe-software-g...@t-online.de> wrote:
>had anybody an Idea whats going wrong, if i try to install
>the C++ Builder 3.0 on a machine with more than 200 MH CPU

>i cannot start the builder  
>an a P/233 ASUS txp4 / AMD K6/233/266/300 with ATC Board )

>i slowed down a 300 MH AMD to 200 MH but it doesnt run

Well,  I have Builder (ver 3.0 Professional) loaded on my home-built
P-233MMX system and it works beautifully.  Have you tried posting to the
borland.public.install.bcppbuilder newsgroup with exact errors you are
getting at instal time?  That group is monitored by Inprise employees,
as it is one of the few where you can get "official tech support" on
this server...

Jerry Bloomfield (TeamB)
--
JersW...@wwa.com

Re:ERROR loading C++ on Machines faster than 200 MH


On Tue, 13 Oct 1998 12:56:59 +0200, carsten bothe

Quote
<bothe-software-g...@t-online.de> wrote:
>had anybody an Idea whats going wrong, if i try to install
>the C++ Builder 3.0 on a machine with more than 200 MH CPU

>i cannot start the builder  
>an a P/233 ASUS txp4 / AMD K6/233/266/300 with ATC Board )

>i slowed down a 300 MH AMD to 200 MH but it doesnt run

>any idea ??

This does not come from the K6. I use Bcb3 since one
month with Win98 and a Amd K6-233 & 64mb ram.
The only new problem is that when I hit a breakpoint
while debugging, the de{*word*81} don't grab focus and
it just flashes the taskbar. I am sure that it is a Win98
problem.
Gerard

Re:ERROR loading C++ on Machines faster than 200 MH


: nomailthankyoug.pa...@wanadoo.fr (gerard patel) wrote:

Quote

>This does not come from the K6. I use Bcb3 since one
>month with Win98 and a Amd K6-233 & 64mb ram.
>The only new problem is that when I hit a breakpoint
>while debugging, the de{*word*81} don't grab focus and
>it just flashes the taskbar. I am sure that it is a Win98
>problem.

Microsoft, in their infinite wisdom, decided to change the meaning of
SetForegroundWindow. Wonderful, isn't it? There is a HUGE thread
recorded at DejaNews that has fixes, curses and justifications (by MS,
haha) for that.

Yes, Microsoft is to blame.

--
Stefan Hoffmeister       http://www.econos.de/
No private email, please, unless expressly invited.

Re:ERROR loading C++ on Machines faster than 200 MH


Quote
> i cannot start the builder
> an a P/233 ASUS txp4 / AMD K6/233/266/300 with ATC Board )

Chances are you have a display driver problem, most probably you even
have the infamous S3 chip (or, it seems, an STB board as well).  There are
5 things you can try to fix this, in this order:

1) Add to the SYSTEM.INI file, in [display] section, the following line:
BusThrottle=1

2) Make sure you have the latest and greatest driver for you display board.
If you do have the much maligned S3 chip, you can also check out www.s3.com
for more drivers.

3) If you add the parameter -ns to the command line in your shortcut that
starts up BCB (for No Splashscreen), it probably will help.

4) You can turn down the hardware acceleration used.  Found in the Properties
of My Computer under the Performance tab.

5) Play the display mode, using different depths and/or screen sizes.

+===================================================+
| Jonathan Arnold (mailto:jdarn...@buddydog.org)    |
| Engineering Manager       Roger Wagner Publishing |
| http://people.ne.mediaone.net/jdarnold            |
+===================================================+

 Diplomacy is the art of saying "Nice doggie" until
 you can find a rock.   -- Will Rogers

Re:ERROR loading C++ on Machines faster than 200 MH


Quote
Stefan Hoffmeister wrote:
> Microsoft, in their infinite wisdom, decided to change the meaning of
> SetForegroundWindow. Wonderful, isn't it? There is a HUGE thread
> recorded at DejaNews that has fixes, curses and justifications (by MS,
> haha) for that.

Ooh, I missed that thread :?)

Which newsgroup?  Any other known API 'implementations' we should be
aware of?

Other Threads