Board index » jbuilder » Another EJBModule Question

2004-01-17 04:57:51 AM
jbuilder12
Using the answers that Lata supplied, I was able to create an ejb-jar
exactly the way I wanted. Thank you very much, Lata!
see: JBX - Several EJBModules in a single project - how to get individual
EJBModules to include ONLY those classes that are necessary
However, I passed the information on to others and they are not getting the
same results.
It turns out that they are not using 'Automatic Source Packages'.
They implicitly add the packages that they care about using 'Add
Files/Packages/Classes'.
The projects in this case are different than the one in my original post.
Pictures and jars are worth thousands of words... see: 'JBX-one EjbModule'
project in the attachments directory.
There are two generated jars
1. GenTabcomp_NoAutoDiscover.jar (OneEjbModuleJPX1.png)
2. GenTabcomp_AutoDiscover.jar (OneEjbModuleJPX2.png)
The only difference between the two projects is that 'Project Properties |
General | Enable source package discovery and compilation' has been turned
on and off, and when off, the package com.guardian.wgs.gentabcomp was
manually added to the project.
No other settings were changed.
However the .jar files generated are quite different (take a look to see
what I mean). It seems that when 'Auto Discovery' is turned off, the
packages are not being built correctly.
Is this because only the top level package was manually added? If so, why
was the cmp package also added?
Thank you,
Joe E.
 

Joe,
I took a look at the jar files you have uploaded to the attachments
group and see the problem. I have unfortunately not been able to
reproduce it.
Not all classes in your project get included in the EJB Jar. By default
the classes defined in the descriptors and any direct dependencies
are included in the EJB Jar. If you uncheck the option to include class
dependencies, then only the EJB classes referenced in the descriptor get
included in the EJB jar. This can be overriden with the use of filters
and file types.
Do you have any custom filters defined? Without filters, this seems to
work fine for me with/without source discovery.
Could you send me a small test case?
Thanks.
- Lata
Joe Enfield wrote:

Lata,
Sorry for the delay. I will try to pare down the project I have, and send
it to you directly (if that is ok).
I will try to have something for you by monday.
Thank you,
Joe E.
"Lata Amujuri" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote in message

{smallsort}

That's good.
Thanks.
- Lata
Joe Enfield wrote:

I've sent you an example. did you get it?
Thanks,
Joe E.
"Lata Amujuri" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote in message