Board index » kylix » Re-Write
Rita
kylix Developer |
Rita
kylix Developer |
Re-Write2007-01-22 11:22:59 AM kylix1 Suppose someone sat down and said Kylix was a good thing but Borland got certain parts wrong, what parts would u put up as their mistakes ? Has anyone here ever written a pascal compiler that could be close to that of Borlands ? How much would it cost to develop a pascal compiler from the ground up ? Rita |
theo
kylix Developer |
2007-01-22 04:52:25 PM
Re:Re-WriteQuoteHas anyone here ever written a pascal compiler that could |
none
kylix Developer |
2007-01-22 05:49:10 PM
Re:Re-Write
Rita wrote:
QuoteSuppose someone sat down and said Kylix was a good thing 3. Avoid all pascalisms. QuoteHas anyone here ever written a pascal compiler that could {smallsort} |
Michael Schnell
kylix Developer |
2007-01-22 06:00:40 PM
Re:Re-Write
1) Lazarus/FreePascal (Open source software): creates native executives
for Windows (PC), WinCE (ARM PDAs) and Linux (PC, Mac, Amiga, ARM PDAs and some more). 2) Chrome (running on Visual Studio) (commercial product by RemObject): Creates .NET assemblies running (supported by the supplier) on .NET (On Windows PCs) Microsoft compact Framework (ARM PDAs), Mono (On Windows PCs, Linux PCs and lots of different platforms <see www.mono.org>) and I suppose there is a compact Mono version, too. I suppose it can do DotGNU, as well. -Michael |
Mike Gallets
kylix Developer |
2007-01-22 09:23:35 PM
Re:Re-Write
My two cents...
Running the Kylix development environment is more tricky than running a compiled application. I can still run apps made with Kylix on SUSE 10. My vote (for now) is to wait for a clearer path because changing development tools is hard. If your target is Microsoft/Net then take a look at C# (Not C or C++). This is the best connect for .NET and the language was designed by the same guy that made Turbo Pascal and Delphi - Anders Hejlsberg. -- Mike Gallets, Giant Systems |
theo
kylix Developer |
2007-01-22 10:05:42 PM
Re:Re-WriteQuote
QuoteMy vote (for QuoteIf your target is Microsoft/Net then take |
Michael Schnell
kylix Developer |
2007-01-22 10:18:46 PM
Re:Re-WriteQuoteIf your target is Microsoft/Net then take (under Windows and Linux) and deploy them for Mono so that the binaries will run in Windows and in Linux. -Michael |
Victor Helsing
kylix Developer |
2007-01-23 04:57:44 AM
Re:Re-Write
I have actually been running Kylix 3 on Suse 10.0 (have not tried it on Suse
10.1) with considerable success. I do have a few font related issues, and it took some effort to convert my large program from VCL to CLX, but overall have been very pleased with how well Kylix seems to be working so far. Unfortunately, the number of good third party components for Kylix is rather limited, so if you want to do sophisticated things with Linux may end up writing the code yourself (and quite possibly bumping up against the limitations of the QT architecture). By the way, I used theo's patch for Kylix (search on google: Kylix Suse 10 theo). Good luck. "Rita" < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote in message QuoteSuppose someone sat down and said Kylix was a good thing |
Martin Schreiber
kylix Developer |
2007-01-26 03:02:48 AM
Re:Re-Write
Rita wrote:
QuoteSuppose someone sat down and said Kylix was a good thing Screenshots: sourceforge.net/project/screenshots.php Martin |
Michael Schnell
kylix Developer |
2007-01-26 04:43:50 PM
Re:Re-WriteQuote
-Michael |
Michael Schnell
kylix Developer |
2007-01-26 04:45:33 PM
Re:Re-WriteQuote1) Lazarus/FreePascal -Michael |
Michael Schnell
kylix Developer |
2007-01-26 04:47:07 PM
Re:Re-WriteQuote1) Lazarus/FreePascal -Michael |
Vincent Snijders
kylix Developer |
2007-01-26 04:49:42 PM
Re:Re-Write
Michael Schnell schreef:
Quote> sourceforge.net/project/stats/detail.php I don't have the count here, but at least that many messages in the newsgroup at Vincent |
Michael Schnell
kylix Developer |
2007-01-26 05:30:39 PM
Re:Re-WriteQuote
were no more messages since. I'll try the group you suggest right now. -Michael |
Marco van de Voort
kylix Developer |
2007-01-27 05:51:02 AM
Re:Re-Write
On 2007-01-22, Rita < XXXX@XXXXX.COM >wrote:
QuoteSuppose someone sat down and said Kylix was a good thing - too much focus on GUI. (maybe a crosscompile/remote debug solution for server Linux apps would have been more succesful, that's where the money was) Also I think Linux simply has a tradition of not paying for software. QuoteHas anyone here ever written a pascal compiler that could be close to that likely several times that. More for the rest. |