Board index » kylix » Re: Kylix - to be or not to be
Re: Kylix - to be or not to be
2003-11-08 02:25:55 AM
I will not be payed for it because then I'm forced to write it as fast as
We also could do smth. that Borland never did (in the last 2 years, at
possible. But I have not that time to do that.
I think the qtintf70.dll is very usefull under Windows. And with theming
it looks very well.
Under Linux a Qt 3 support is needed because of antialised fonts, theming
What is the problem with Qt 3 license under Linux? It is GPL/QPL. Kylix's
VisualCLX is GPL, too. And with the RTL from the FreeCLX project we have a
complete GPL'ed Kylix environment. (Where is my fault if any?). For
commercial application Qt should be LGPL'ed or another license. But
unfortunately it is not LGPL'ed.
For Qt 3 bindings I have a technique that makes it possible to dynamically
link against libqtmt.so directly without any C++->C wrapper shared object.
(www.kylix-patch.de.vu unofficial VisualCLX patches)